Where did the Israelites originally come from?

History

2 answers:

kramer3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

In early history, Israelites were simply members of the 12 tribes of Israel. After 930 bce and the establishment of two independent Hebrew kingdoms in Palestine, the 10 northern tribes constituting the kingdom of Israel were known as Israelites to distinguish them from the southern kingdom of Judah.

Explanation:

OLEGan [10]3 years ago

5 0

Jesus Jesus Jesus Jesus Jesus Jesus

You might be interested in

How did the english government change in the 17th century

Mars2501 [29]

The main way in which the English government changed during this time was that the power of the monarchy was greatly restricted by Parliament, due to the fact that people were upset with the king abusing his power.

4 0

3 years ago

Which of these was a reason the American colonies were fighting a war for independence in 1776?

Rufina [12.5K]

Multiple reasons. Firstly, Britain (a world-wide power) was setting humongous taxes on imported and exported goods. (As in the 'Tea Party' the Americans rebelled by throwing the tea into the sea). The colonies were irritated by this whole control, and wanted more power and say in what taxes were put on them.

6 0

3 years ago

Which American president was responsible for the massive military buildup in

Ghella [55]

Answer:

Explanation:

Lyndon B. Johnson

3 0

2 years ago

Which two countries gained territories as a result of the Treaty of Paris 1763?

Lunna [17]

Britain was really the only one but if your guessing the second territory i will go with france

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Compare and contrast the ways that seventeenth-century

Lina20 [59]

Answer:

<h2>Important differences - Unlike the other two, Charles I was not associated with any political Party, and had not "risen through the ranks" to become Leader. As a King, he achieved his position by heredity, and since no-one can choose their parents, this was used to justify the doctrine of "Divine Right" - God dedcides that a child shall be born into a Royal succession, and it is blasphemy to make any attempt to change this. Similarly, it was therefore the "will of God" that he should be succeeded by one of his children - the eldest son, in the English and Scottish tradition. In England, there was also the unusual situation that, as well as being Head of State, the King was also Head of a particular religious organization - the "Church of England" - which meant that he could not be expected to recognise any other form of Christianity. It was his enforcement of this which aroused resistance by such men as Cromwell, who was against any enofrced religon, and for "liberty of conscience". (This was why Cromwell subsequently also opposed Parliament when it attempted to enforce Presbyterianism,) There is perhaps case for seeing a similarity in Stalin, since "Marxist/Leninist Communism" was in fact a "religion", even though a godless one. There are virtually no comparisons with Hitler.</h2>

3 0

3 years ago