Answer: True
Explanation: True. Because the practice of neocolonialism is that the more developed economies try to exert influence in developing countries through economic aid indirectly, creating a state of dependence for their economic, social, political and cultural conditions. Circumstance that is taken advantage of by those powers that see in this new system of colonialism the opportunity to achieve more wealth and to subjugate the countries over which they exert such influence to obtain their own benefit.
New England
Harsh rocky soil made farming difficult, led to subsistence farms
New England
Land was granted to a group and towns were subdivided among families
New England
Fishing including whaling (lighting
New England
Shipbuilding and small-scale factories
New England
Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Conneticut, New Hampshire
Middle
Blended other two
Middle
"Bread Basket" of the colonies
Middle
River system and ports provided access to back country and Atlantic
Southern
Favorable agricultural climate
Middle
New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware
Southern
Plantation system developed
Southern
Export crops: "cash crops" such as tobacco grown
Southern
Larger slave population was needed as labor
Southern
Farms tended to be scattered, less urban development.
Southern
Maryland, Virginia, South Carolina, Georgia
Thanks!
The answer is b just took the test
In the mid-1800s, Democrats believed that a policy of Manifest Destiny would boost the American economy and open up economic opportunities.
<h3>What was the
Manifest Destiny?</h3>
It meant the the idea that the United States is destined by God and its advocates to to expand its dominion and spread democracy and capitalism across the entire North American continent.
However, the Democrats believed that a policy of Manifest Destiny would boost the American economy and open up economic opportunities.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about Manifest Destiny
brainly.com/question/647259
#SPJ1
I'm a capitalist myself i can tell you the facts,
one OPPOSING view point to capitalism is if there is no regulations for businesses people think that CEO's can overwork union workers and give them lower wages without any punishment.
A SUPPORTING view point to capitalism is that with fewer restrictions there is more opportunity for individual success and profit for business.
ANY QUESTIONS?
