Explanation: how should I explain the two examples I gave plz help 20 points or moreThe setting and what is happening in no dog's bark provide imagery. "As his hands grabbed his father's throat, he clutched at the head, shaking as if it were a rattle." The details evoke a vivid image in the reader's mind, especially when the author uses an example of a rattle. in the sentence "there was the moon facing them a large red moon that filled their eyes with light and stretched and darkened its shadow over the earth" The details that the author uses to describe the moon and how they looked and how the earth looked was extremely specific and had enough detail to paint the image in our minds.
Answer:
I think that most of the claims listed above could be argued well with specific evidence from Thoreau's essay, but I would be a little suspicious of one of the claims and downright skeptical about another one. To me, Thoreau seems disturbed by the emphasis on technological "improvements" in his day, such as the telegraph and railroad, but does he really believe that technology is the "primary cause of distress"? Right now, I really don't know, so I would wait to see how well the writer could support this interpretation before I would make up my mind
Explanation:
there u go
Answer:
2. People should never handle food when ther’re sick
Explanation:
because it uses the world “should”
The answer is A. Hope this helped.
Answer:it’s is very good and interesting
Explanation:
I think the story says enough detail and it’s fun up t read very good
