It's either B or D, but I'm leaning towards to B.
The ironic thing in the words used by the narrator to describe the summoner in "the prologue" to The Canterbury Tales is:
- <u>The Summoner was corrupt and was ready to forgive a transgression for a cup of wine</u>
According to the complete text, we can see that the Summoner is trying to convince a transgressor that he would allow him to keep a concubine if only he gave him a quart of wine.
As a result of this, we can see that the ironic thing is that the Summoner is supposed to be a church excommunicator who is sent by the Archdeacon to expunge people who committed offences against the doctrines of the church but he was willing to accept a bribe so that he would not do his job.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/12612099
Answer:
C) She claimed that bizarre noises accompanied the light.
Explanation:
Many people from the town claimed to have seen this phenomenon. Each of their statements have one thing in common: they saw a light of the unknown source. There are ongoing debates about the origin of this strange light, but the existance of the light itself is undebatable. Young mother also states that she saw the light. However, the main difference in her statement is that, besides light, she heard bizzare noises accompanying it.
