All categories

3 years ago

Please help on this math question. Will be marked as BRAINLEST!

Mathematics

2 answers:

leonid [27]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

$25 \times 25 - 15 \times 15 = 400$

$\sqrt{400} = 20$

emmainna [20.7K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

b=√400

=20

Step-by-step explanation:

15^2+b^2=25^2

225 + b^2=625

b^2=625-225

b^2=400

b=√400

b=20

You might be interested in

Isn’t it just 5? Why would it say check all that apply

LenKa [72]

Answer: $25^\frac{1}{2}$

Step-by-step explanation:

25 = 5*5 or -5 * -5

yes, that is correct. However, you forgot another property of roots. Roots are simply exponential fractions.

$\sqrt[n]{x^m}=x^\frac{m}{n}$

Therefore, $\sqrt{25}$ can also be rewritten as: $25^\frac{1}{2}$ . Notice that it cannot be -25 because that would be a negative square root which will give us an imaginary number.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLEASE ANSWER QUICKLY!!!!

nikitadnepr [17]

It’s kinda blurry, can u retake it

7 0

3 years ago

Suppose that the weights of 5400 registered female Labrador retrievers in the United States are distributed normally with a mean

Maurinko [17]

Answer:

$N= 4543$ Labrador retrievers

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that the mean $\mu$ is:

$\mu = 62.5$

and the standard deviation $\sigma$ is:

$\sigma=2.5$

The probability that a randomly selected Labrador retriever weighs less than 65 pounds is:

$P(X$

We calculate the Z-score for X =65

$Z = \frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}\\\\Z =\frac{65-62.5}{65}=1$

$P(X$

Looking in the table for the standard normal distribution we have to:

$P(Z$ .

Finally the amount N of Labrador retrievers that weigh less than 65 pounds is:

$N = P(X$

$N = 0.8413*5400$

$N= 4543$ Labrador retrievers

6 0

3 years ago

What is the measure of the secant CD

Zielflug [23.3K]

<span>The answer to your question is 3.</span>

8 0

4 years ago

Hello I would really appreciate if someone could help me with this math question. I’m so confused

Katarina [22]

Answer:

a. f = 17.5/c

b. 8.75 N

Step-by-step explanation:

Inverse variation means one variable is proportional to the inverse of the other. The equation for that is ...

f = k(1/c) . . . . . . force (f) is proportional to the inverse of distance (c)

We find the value of k using data given for a specific instance.

3.5 N = k(1/(5 cm)) . . . . use the given values

17.5 N·cm = k . . . . . . multiply by the denominator

Then the equation of interest is ...

f = 17.5/c . . . . . . . where c is in cm, and f is in newtons

Using the above equation, we find the force to be ...

f = 17.5/2 = 8.75 . . . . newtons

_____

<em>Additional comment</em>

We often look at several different kinds of proportionality:

y = kx . . . . direct
y = k(1/x) . . . . inverse
y = kx² . . . . proportional as the square
y = kx·z . . . . jointly proportional to x and z

and there are combinations of these, such as ...

y = kr²h . . . . jointly proportional to h and the square of r

You may have noticed that when x and y are inversely proportional, their product is a constant. y = k/x ⇒ xy = k

We have left off the units of k in the problem above. Sometimes it is a good idea to retain them, or to pay close attention to what they are. This can avoid using the wrong measures for the variables.

f = (17.5 N·cm)/(2 cm) = 8.75 N . . . . . units of cm cancel

4 0

2 years ago