6. Look closely at the passages involving the narrator's original household,

English

1 answer:

sergij07 [2.7K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer and Explanation:

This question is about the short story "The Black Cat" by Edgar Allan Poe.

The narrator is originally a good man who, in the end, kills his own wife and their black cat.

Poe uses several symbols to portray the narrator's mental state. <u>The original household, a good house where the narrator and his wife lived with several pets, represents freedom and balance. That was when the narrator was still a sane, loving man. The fire that destroys his home represents the decay of his mental state, its deterioration. Just like the fire consumed the house, alcoholism is consuming the narrator and his qualities. Finally, the impoverished house and the cellar - damp, dark, and suffocating - represent his insanity. The narrator is now trapped in his own craziness.</u>

You might be interested in

If in a book a girl is not popular, Her parents are over protective of her,she doesn't have lots of friends, she likes a boy, an

erma4kov [3.2K]

The girl will talk to the boy and the girl would become jealous because she's talking to the boy. They end up spending a lot of time together afterwards. Because they are both attracted to each other and they finally end up going out afterwards and everything falls in place

8 0

3 years ago

What do you call the process of labeling the stress patterns in poetry?

LenaWriter [7]

This is called scansion

4 0

3 years ago

Which of these following descriptions is most likely from the perspective of an unreliable narrator ?

erik [133]

Answer:

C. The cat scratched Amelia because it knows what I know - that Amelia wants my job.

Explanation:

This description is most likely from the perspective of an unreliable narrator. This is because we do not actually know what the cat knows or if it even understands human behaviors. Also, this narrator seems a little paranoid about the security of her job. These details make the narrator unreliable.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Workloads in a child care facility should be

polet [3.4K]

Correct Answer: D. Heavier for new employees

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can someone write me a mysterious event essay with 150 words pleaseeeee

MArishka [77]

Answer:

The government should regulate what people eat and drink because of obesity and THE REGULATIONS CAN PROMOTE A HEALTHIER AMERICA.

Obesity is a worldwide problem and many people overlook how dangerous it really is, because of this the government should regulate what people eat and drink.According to Source 1, Dr. Steven Safyer, President and CEO of Montefiore Medical Center,“For the past several years, I’ve seen the number of children and adults struggling with obesity skyrocket, putting them at early risk of diabetes, heart disease, and cancer” (Jaslow, 9). In other words, Children and adults are struggling with obesity which is putting them at risk for diabetes and heart disease and cancer. If we continue to be able to pick our own food and drinks we are Liable to harm ourselves. the government regulating what we eat will also be impactful for people who can't help but want to better themselves.

Although local people argue that “We are smart enough to make our own decisions about what to eat and drink,” it can be argued that Government officials just want people healthier so the risk of diabetes,cancers and others won't happen rather than people being at risk to die instead. One example from the passage is Nutritionist Karen Congro, director of the Wellness for Life Program at the Brooklyn Hospital Center “Unless they get the educational portion along with it, they won’t understand why it’s being banned and how it relates to them personally,” ( Jaslow 10). This suggests that if the government doesn't regulate people well never understand the risk there putting themselves at. People would still have the right to choose, govrnment regulation would just make the default choice a healthy one.

Also, the government should regulate what people eat and drink because THE REGULATIONS CAN PROMOTE A HEALTHIER AMERICA. “For the past several years, I’ve seen the number of children and adults struggling with obesity skyrocket, putting them at early risk of diabetes, heart disease, and cancer, Dr. Steven Safyer, President and CEO of Montefiore Medical Center, said in an emailed statement to CBSNews.comThis policy is a great step in the battle to turn this health crisis around.”( Jaslow 9) This shows how if the government dosent put up the law people will comtinue to get hurt and people will stay sick.

According to Source 2 “You may not care whether sodas are bad for health, but plenty of other people do. These include, among others, officials who must spend taxpayer dollars to care for the health of people with obesity-related chronic illnesses, employers dealing with a chronically ill workforce, the parents and teachers of overweight children, dentists who treat tooth decay, and a military desperate for recruits who can meet fitness standards”(Nestle 17) However , soda isnt the only culpret for obbesty but it is one that need to be focused on.

Inconclusion , the government should regulate what people eat and drink because of obesity and THE REGULATIONS CAN PROMOTE A HEALTHIER AMERICA.

Explanation:

thts one of my old essays so

7 0

2 years ago