1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Angelina_Jolie [31]
3 years ago
10

What are the three ways employers read resumes?

English
1 answer:
solniwko [45]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Employers read abstracts in three ways:

Explanation:

1. The job for which you apply is important

First, if your CV is important for the job for which you employ, an employer will notice it. Do you live close enough to the job to move to it? Is your training closely aligned with the job you have applied for? Make sure your experience and achievements are tailored to demonstrate how the work you do is claiming benefits. Employers don't want to know how they apply their credentials. Just clarify it. Just clarify it.

2.You have the skills to perform the work

Employers often regret the fact that they receive the majority of curriculum vitae for their job from candidates who are simply not qualified. Too many people believe that their chances of becoming employed can be increased by applying for more jobs. That's not how it works.

3.You have a good sense of humor

What does that say about your work ethic or attention to detail if you send your resume to highlight your job qualifications, which is doomed with characteristics or grammatical errors?

 

You might be interested in
It’s important to ___ some free time to volunteer work, if you would like to study in a Canadian
Ghella [55]
It’s important to save some free time...
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help please i need a answer fast !!!
koban [17]
D- serves as a turning point.
4 0
3 years ago
Which is a central idea of gates mister jefferson and the trials of phillis wheatley
patriot [66]

This essay is an expanded version of the lecture Henry Louis Gates, Jr., presented at the Library of Congress in March, 2002, as one of a series of the prestigious Jefferson Lectures in the Humanities. In his analysis of the controversy surrounding Phillis Wheatley’s poetry, Gates demonstrates that theoretical issues debated in the academy are indeed relevant to the everyday lives of Americans. Gates, chairman of the Department of African and African American Studies at Harvard University, is a prominent intellectual. In his preface he states that the National Endowment for the Humanities, in honoring him by inviting him to lecture, acknowledges the importance of African American studies in the intellectual life of the United States.

His extended argument is crafted to explain how Thomas Jefferson and Wheatley were instrumental in founding the tradition of African American literature. An exchange of letters between a French diplomat and Jefferson debated the question of the intellectual potential of African slaves. The controversy continued throughout the first half of the nineteenth century and was a central issue in the abolitionist movement.

Gates has demonstrated throughout a prolific publishing career his mastery of a variety of literary genres, from personal memoir to academic critical theory. In this essay he writes for a general audience, presenting his argument in forceful, eloquent prose. He tells a compelling story, with frequent witty references to topical issues. Although securely grounded in his identity as an African American, Gates argues that the reading and interpretation of literature must be free of racial bias. Despite the explosive growth in the past thirty years of publication of creative works and literary criticism in African American studies, many readers will not be familiar with Wheatley’s life and work, so Gates provides the necessary biographical and historical background.

On October 8, 1772, Phillis Wheatley was called before a committee of eighteen prominent Bostonians who had gathered to judge whether the celebrated young poet was an imposter. The larger issue at stake was one widely debated in eighteenth century America and Europe: Did Africans have the intellectual capacity to create literature? At the heart of this question was the contemporary belief that Africans were a subspecies, existing somewhere between the apes and civilized humans. The confrontation between Wheatley and her interrogators was important. If she, an African, could create original literature, she must be recognized as fully human. Slavery, justified at that time by assuming the racial inferiority of Africans, would therefore be morally indefensible.

Wheatley had arrived in Boston on a sailing ship from West Africa in 1761. She was estimated to be seven or eight years old at the time because she had lost her front baby teeth. Although her birthplace was unknown, Gates speculates that she spoke Wolof, a West African language. She was purchased as a house slave by John Wheatley, a successful merchant, for his wife Susanna, who named the child Phillis after the ship that had brought her to America.

The Wheatleys’ daughter Mary taught Phillis to read and write both English and Latin. She was, without question, an immensely gifted child. In 1767 she began publishing her poetry in periodicals and broadsheets, poems printed on a single piece of paper and sold on the street. The public in both England and America gave her poetry an enthusiastic reception. She wrote primarily elegies and panegyrics, or praises for current events and well-known people. Her predominant form was the heroic couplet, pairs of rhymed lines in iambic pentameter, in the style of English poet Alexander Pope.

Placing Wheatley in the context of eighteenth century racial beliefs, Gates draws on the complex theories of such philosophers as Francis Bacon, Immanuel Kant, and David Hume to frame the public debate on the question of the humanity of Africans. He quotes extensively from contemporary texts to illustrate popular beliefs, many of which would appall twenty-first century readers.

In the light of this controversy, Wheatley was a disturbing... (this is a para. offline) not stealing just showing/helping  you 

4 0
3 years ago
Helpppppppppppppppppppp
TEA [102]

I think it's VANITY

Explanation:

I just looked up each definition

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Like most romanticists, Shelley, Byron, and Keats tried to connect with the reader by employing specific literary techniques. In
Anna71 [15]

Answer:The poets of the next generation shared their predecessors’ passion for liberty (now set in a new perspective by the Napoleonic Wars) and were in a position to learn from their experiments. Percy Bysshe Shelley in particular was deeply interested in politics, coming early under the spell of the anarchist views of William Godwin, whose Enquiry Concerning Political Justice had appeared in 1793. Shelley’s revolutionary ardour caused him to claim in his critical essay “A Defence of Poetry” (1821, published 1840) that “the most unfailing herald, companion, and follower of the awakening of a great people to work a beneficial change in opinion or institution, is poetry,” and that poets are “the unacknowledged legislators of the world.” This fervour burns throughout the early Queen Mab (1813), the long Laon and Cythna (retitled The Revolt of Islam, 1818), and the lyrical drama Prometheus Unbound (1820). Shelley saw himself at once as poet and prophet, as the fine “Ode to the West

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What does this phrase need to make it an independent clause?<br> threw the ball
    6·2 answers
  • Describe the symptom of his disorder symbolized by his room service order
    15·1 answer
  • Why is the married couple staying in the summer country mansion
    14·1 answer
  • In Milkweed by Jerry Spinelli
    9·1 answer
  • Choose the best concluding sentence for this paragraph.
    12·1 answer
  • The Two Clashing Meanings of " Free Speech” by Teresa M. Bejan
    11·1 answer
  • Documentation is the process of giving credit for ideas that are not the writer's own ideas.
    13·1 answer
  • Relationship between self,society and culture
    5·2 answers
  • What is enthusiasm ?????<br><br><br><br><br><br>(◍•ᴗ•◍)♡​
    15·2 answers
  • Trees___have watee to grow<br>a,must<br>b,has to<br>c,ought to<br>d,need out​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!