1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr Goodwill [35]
3 years ago
13

Will mark brainliest, answer each questions in paragraph

English
1 answer:
Natasha_Volkova [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

I see a dead bird with its spirit flying high the way it hase been drawn is beautiful there are 4 colors (from my perspective) 1 is black 2 is white 3 is brown and 4 is grey the picture makes me feel sad since every living animal/human will die eventually.

Explanation:

hope this helps.

You might be interested in
Which sentence from “The Most Dangerous Game” suggests Person vs. Environment conflict?
Fittoniya [83]

Answer:

I guess the answer is option 4 and it shows the conflict between nature and man

Explanation:

In Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game", the story revolves around the protagonist Sanger Rainsford, a famed hunter. After he was stranded in an island owned by Colonel Zaroff, he became the hunted/ prey, thus the reversal of roles. This led to his conflicts in trying to keep himself safe from the barbaric hands of the Colonel who was adamant on killing him for sport.

Conflicts in a story is when one attribute is in opposition against another factor, leading to a difference in opinion and fighting between the two sides.

The case of man versus nature conflict can be seen/ found in the sentence "What perils that tangle of trees and underbrush might hold for him did not concern Rainsford just then."

This sentence is after Rainsford escaped to the forest, eluding the Colonel. He no longer cares what the environment will do to him as long as he is safe from the guns and hands of the Colonel.

7 0
3 years ago
The sea creeps to pillage, She leaps on her prey; A child of the village Was murdered to-day. What would be the impact of replac
JulijaS [17]

<u>What would be the impact of replacing the word murdered in stanza 3 with the word drowned?</u>

D) The stanza would be more informative.

<u>Choice of words</u> can change a poem's tone and mood. A more <u>precise word </u>can give either more power to the stanza or more information. In the case of replacing <em>murdered</em> with <em>drowned</em>, the impact would be that the reader will be captivated and have more specific and significant details about the child's murder.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you say to your significant other, "I see you didn't put gas in my car after borrowing it", the relationship level of meaning
Sati [7]

Answer:

- You don't respect me .

- You are too lazy to refill the gas tank.

Explanation:

'Relationship level of meaning' is associated with the connotative meaning which is intended to be displayed by the speaker which is contrary to the content level meaning that reflects the literal or explicit meaning of the message. 'Relationship level' of meaning reflects the type of relationship shared by two people.

According to the description given, the relationship level of meaning would involve 'you don't respect me' and 'You are too lazy to refill the gas tank' which implies that the speaker shows his/her authority(implied by 'you don't respect me') and at the same time, the remarks('you are too lazy..') reflect that he well knows the person he/she is communicating with. This implies that the two share a positive bond.

7 0
3 years ago
According to sociologists, there is a correlation between a group's:
Sliva [168]
<span>A. cultural diversity and its interaction with outsiders.</span>

In the context of symbolic interactionism, it the study of human conduct and human life. How one’s social life is formed and is being described by one’s perspective of self and others –community, society and etc. In this approach, these 3 views were asserted by Herbert Blumer (1969) as follows: 
<span><span>1.       </span>People act on a specific object based on how they see or construe it according to their outlook and attribution on the object.</span> <span><span>
2.       </span>These certain outlooks and attribution that has been formed by an individual is shaped and reinforced by the people this individual is exposed to.</span> <span><span>
3.       </span>These outlooks and attribution are continuously changed and altered based on one’s social environment.<span>
</span></span>

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help with this. Stories that we read are love after love, when greek meets greek, the youngest doll, the censors, day of
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

Conflict in literature refers to any problem the protagonist has to overcome in order to solve a given situation and reach a goal or accomplish its mission. The conflict is a must-have asset for any literature for it gives the meaning to the whole text, there has to be a problem to be solved, a mountain to climb, a goal to reach, this is the importance of the conflict. There are 2 types of conflict, internal and external conflict.  

Internal conflict are the problems that happen inside the protagonist´s mind , a struggle between two feelings fighting each other up to the point the protagonist succumbs to one or none of the feelings and reach a conclusion. There are only 2 types of internal conflict, man versus self and man versus sickness that sometimes can also be a psychological disease and its still man versus self.

On the other hand External conflicts involve every problem that can be caused by an external source, this being, another person, the nature, a machine, etc.  

On the story No dogs barks the author introduces the conflict slowly, it seems to be an external conflict at the beginning since Ignacio was wounded and his old father was carrying him to help him, but as the story goes on it turns into an internal conflict as the father realizes that wasn’t his son anymore and has an internal problem in which his feeling of guilt with his dead wife won’t let him drop his son and let  him die as he explains how badly his son has repaid all of his hard work raising him, he grew up to be a murderer and even as his father was dying while helping Ignacio, he didn´t even helped him hear the dogs bark. At the end by letting go of his son the conflict is solved and they finally reach where the dogs bark.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which ending to this scene would be most ironic?
    7·1 answer
  • The media doesn't influence me, but my sister's friends are clearly very much influenced. They always wear the latest fashions!"
    5·1 answer
  • Why is lady Macbeth cruel in act 1 scene 5?
    10·1 answer
  • In Great Expectations, Pip literally shakes the dust and dirt off after his visit to the prison with Wemmick. Comment on the iro
    15·1 answer
  • 6- Put an X next to the item that best fits the moral of this story:
    11·1 answer
  • HFUL ANSWERS ONLY PLEASE <br><br> How can assumptions force opinions and limit perception
    10·1 answer
  • I got a 14/28 on my english test , all of you are stupidddddd brain.;y is dumb, don't use this website
    14·2 answers
  • BRAINLIESTTT ANSWERR CORRECTLYY PLZZZ FOR BRAINLIEST AND A COOKIE (QUESTION 8)
    11·1 answer
  • HOW DO WE KNOW WHAT IS RIGHT? WHY DO PEOPLE CHOOSE TO DO WRONG ? IN 3 PARAGRAPHS OR TWO PLEASE !!!
    10·1 answer
  • Which section from the article best explains why the us government spil tribal lands into smaller pieces
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!