What is not typically present in works of the theater of the absurd?a. Implicit themesb. Stage directions c. A resolution to the conflictd. Internal conflict
<u>Answer:</u>
A resolution to the conflict is not typically present in works of the theater of the absurd.
c. A resolution to the conflict
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Theater of the Absurd assaults the agreeable convictions of strict or political conventionality. A type of dramatization that accentuates the foolishness of human presence by utilizing incoherent, monotonous, and unimportant exchange, purposeless and confounding circumstances, and plots that need practical or intelligent improvement.
Theater of the Absurd, emotional works of certain European and American producers of the 1950s and mid '60s who concurred with the Existentialist savant Albert Camus' appraisal, in his article "The Myth of Sisyphus" (1942), that the human circumstance is basically preposterous, without reason. So a goals to the contention isn't commonly present in works of the venue of the ludicrous.
Answer:
Elizabethan manners.
Explanation:
According to the given passage from "Elizabethan Etiquette", it is narrated that a lord or lady in the court of Queen Elizabeth would have to learn the various etiquette rules and even go as far as memorising them because they are so complex.
From the passage, the main topic is Elizabethan manners.
Answer:
the answer is "informal language"
It would be c. she. This is because a pronoun is - "<span>a word that can function by itself as a noun phrase and that refers either to the participants in the discourse (e.g., </span>I<span>, </span>you<span> ) or to someone or something mentioned elsewhere in the discourse (e.g., </span>she<span>, </span>it<span>, </span>this<span> )."
Hope I helped :)</span>
