1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Flura [38]
3 years ago
8

How did the French and Indian War lead to tensions between England and its colonies?

History
1 answer:
Lilit [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Your answer is here but you have to mark it as brainliest answer as it will also give you 3 points

Explanation:

The French and Indian War was the North American conflict in a larger imperial war between Great Britain and France known as the Seven Years’ War. The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war’s expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.

Map from the French and Indian War

The French and Indian War resulted from ongoing frontier tensions in North America as both French and British imperial officials and colonists sought to extend each country’s sphere of influence in frontier regions. In North America, the war pitted France, French colonists, and their Native allies against Great Britain, the Anglo-American colonists, and the Iroquois Confederacy, which controlled most of upstate New York and parts of northern Pennsylvania. In 1753, prior to the outbreak of hostilities, Great Britain controlled the 13 colonies up to the Appalachian Mountains, but beyond lay New France, a very large, sparsely settled colony that stretched from Louisiana through the Mississippi Valley and Great Lakes to Canada. (See Incidents Leading up to the French and Indian War and Albany Plan)

The border between French and British possessions was not well defined, and one disputed territory was the upper Ohio River valley. The French had constructed a number of forts in this region in an attempt to strengthen their claim on the territory. British colonial forces, led by Lieutenant Colonel George Washington, attempted to expel the French in 1754, but were outnumbered and defeated by the French. When news of Washington’s failure reached British Prime Minister Thomas Pelham-Holles, Duke of Newcastle, he called for a quick undeclared retaliatory strike. However, his adversaries in the Cabinet outmaneuvered him by making the plans public, thus alerting the French Government and escalating a distant frontier skirmish into a full-scale war.

You might be interested in
American revolutionary leaders were deeply influenced by this man's writings. A. Richard Nixon B. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney C
Flauer [41]
<span>C. John Locke
hope it helps
</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Was the pope a political leader or a religious leader? Explain what you mean.
KIM [24]

Answer:

I would say both however, more towards the religious side.

Explanation:

The pope deals with many controversial topics even though he is the leader of a religious organization.

Comment if you want even more words XD

5 0
2 years ago
Although Charlemagne’s reign is considered one of the best during the Middle Ages, there were still problems. What were 2 key is
Readme [11.4K]
There was a lot of death and adultery
8 0
2 years ago
Three reasons why Harold went against King Edward’s wishes over the rising against Tostig.
lukranit [14]
What the are the answer choices????/


6 0
3 years ago
How do you think Native Americans would have responded to news about the Treaty of Tordesillas and the Line of Demarcation
grandymaker [24]

For Native Americans at the time, it would have been next to impossible to understand something like the Treaty of Tordesillas. This treaty intended to partition tracts of land that the Europeans did not even know whether they existed, an action that may have looked like sheer madness and even dishonorable, for the Europeans claimed possession of lands they had not conquered by the force of their arms.Maybe, after some thought and analysis,  Native Americans would have felt outraged as a man living in such a distant place, the Pope in Rome, who had no authority whatsoever for them, made the decision of handing over lands, people,wealth, etc, to two different groups of Europeans. Perhaps, other Native Americans, once they managed to understand that agreement so odd to them, might have found it laughable and it might have prompted them to challenge to take what was their own over their dead bodies.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these was a factor in the great schism
    14·2 answers
  • What does the commerce clause authorize the federal government to do?
    15·1 answer
  • The term “caudillo” refers to a(n)
    10·2 answers
  • The U.S. government supported the automobile by subsidizing
    8·1 answer
  • What is a community of non-Muslim religious minorities called?
    15·1 answer
  • What are the blanks?
    8·1 answer
  • What were some of the reasons of Greek colonization in 750 bc and 550bc
    10·1 answer
  • here are some free point for all you people out there that atually helpes others instead of sending a link i appreciate it
    5·2 answers
  • Why would the Egyptians build enormous and<br> elaborate temples and tombs
    13·1 answer
  • Consider the events you listed above, and respond to the following prompt based on your notes from the table:
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!