1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
REY [17]
3 years ago
6

In your opinion, what is the most effective method for changing society—voting, challenges in the

History
1 answer:
aivan3 [116]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

In my opinion, the most effective way to promote long-term social changes is through voting. This is so because, through elections, society expresses its will regarding the different problems and situations that are generated in its daily life, in a legitimate way.

In this way, each citizen votes for the political sector that most represents his interests and his ideology, a sector that in turn proposes changes for society, or the preservation of the prevailing situations at the time.

Thus, in the 1960s the exercise of the vote by African Americans after the Civil Rights Movement allowed the consolidation of favorable policies towards this social group in terms of equal access to rights.

You might be interested in
How many years separated the First and the Fourth Crusades?
mariarad [96]

He first Crusade was in the period (1096-1099) and the Fourth Crusade was in the period (1202-1204)   

<span>(1202-1099)----------103 years <span>separated the First and the Fourth Crusades

</span></span>The crusades were a military campaigns with the specific objective of restoring christian control of the Holy Land<span> , were fought over a period of almost 200 years.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
HELP ASAP Which developments helped make the cattle business profitable?
timurjin [86]

Answer:

That dude is unreal

Explanation:

idk what is wrong with him

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. Is the minimum wage good or bad for the lowest-paid workers? Explain your reasoning.
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer: This is quite a complicated question and therefore requires quite a complicated and extensive answer.  While it may seem like a minimum wage is good for the lowest-paid workers it isn't very good for an economy and workers as a whole.  The reason for this being is that having a minimum wage and subsequently raising it (as is being done throughout the United States) boosts inflation meaning the price for products rises, (essentially negating all benefits that the workers received from a higher minimum wage.)  Now while the lowest class workers don't really receive any benefit from this as their wage goes up but the products they produce also go up in price as well, but the average middle class consumer gets hit hard by this as their product prices raise but they still have the same wage.  Another downside to having a minimum wage and having it consistently rising is that companies are forced to cut employees or not hire any more people all together.  This is why jobless claims rise after wages rise.  Companies cannot afford to pay workers a higher minimum wage and keep all their workers at the same time otherwise they would go in the red.  This forces them to make cuts in staffing.  Minimum wage would mandate that even if a potential worker and company agree on a price to pay for their work, the law would mandate that this would not be a possibility essentially making work harder to find.  Minimum wage should not even really be needed as companies and workers should be able to find a good and fair price for work on their own without the governments help.  If a worker doesn't like the wage they are receiving then they can quite and find a better paying job.  This also boosts competition among businesses as they are all fighting for workers to fill their jobs and would also raise the wage, but in a natural process without all the detriments that artificially raising the minimum wage brings.  Companies should be allowed to hire workers at whatever pay per hour they so what as long as it is agreed to as well by the worker.  This means that more jobs are open to a more wide variety of people and that also means that if people want to work for less they can still be open to that opportunity as well.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the role of pawnbrokers in the High Middle Ages?
Talja [164]
The role of pawnbrokers in the middle ages is : Making loans in exchange for property
So basically if the people in that period need some sort of fund, they can get it with the exchange of their valuable personal property (such as expensive arts, antiques, or gem stones)

hope this helps
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
...<br> what did i do welppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
kow [346]

i have not the slightest clue wat u have done


6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Andrew Johnson was impeached, but not convicted, because
    15·2 answers
  • What do Kemal Ataturk, Sun Yat-sen, and Simon Bolivar have in common?
    6·1 answer
  • Who was Lemuel Hayes and how did he contribute to the Revolutionary War.
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following individuals led a revolt against the French in Senegal? a. Cecil Rhodes c. Leopold II b. Samory Toure d.
    7·1 answer
  • How do you think the people reacted to this new religion and prophet Muhmammad
    13·1 answer
  • What was Economics of the colony and it’s influence in Europe and the development of a labor force
    9·1 answer
  • English playwright who wrote tragedies and comedies
    6·2 answers
  • What message in the cartoon above trying to send and how does it relate to the theories of Laisses-faire and Social Darwinism?​
    8·1 answer
  • Key Terms
    6·1 answer
  • Background Information: The Catholic Church supported
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!