The backstory of the Dred Scott v. Sanford, was essentially that Dred Scott, a slave of Sanford, sued for his freedom, since his master moved to a free territory, he should be automatically freed, per the requirements of the land. However, the Supreme Court ruled that he still had to stay as a slave, as he was Sanford's property, and property is not limited simply because of the type of territory they were in. Essentially, as long as the slave was bought at a slave state, the owner can keep him/her regardless if they move to a free state or not.
The effect of this on the North was public outrage, as they believed that the south would overstep and become too powerful as compared to the North. After all, the ability to move slaves into newly 'created' western territories, coupled with the historical 3/5th Compromise, resulted in large significant portion which may become slave territory, thereby tipping the balance of governmental power in favor of the south. The second effect of the Dred Scott case was the doubling down of the efforts towards the Underground Railroad, as well as the extension to British Canada, which was a free state. In essence, it was not enough for slaves to escape to a northern territory, as they can still be caught and returned to their masters under the Dred Scott v. Sanford ruling. However, if they were to escape to Canada, the US would then have no authority or obligation in which to capture the escapee.
Essentially, the North protested the case ruling, and put in more effort in ensuring that escaping slaves would stay free, by extending the underground railroad into Canada.
~
it killed nearly 80% of the population.
Answer:
b. Very few Mexican immigrants worked as migrant farm laborers.
Explanation:
New industries in the Southwest of America during the 1890s, especially in agriculture and mining, attracted Mexican immigrants. Mexican immigrants in Texas hold up to 9% of the population. The Mexican immigrants came from rural areas as labourers to work in mining and agricultural fields for stability and employment. The Mexican Revolution increased the flow of Mexican people in America, who were refugees and political exile decamped to America to escape death and violence.
Explanation:
No, he wasn't. Louis had a lot of power but he never used it for any good. He wanted to become a good leader and king, however, he was more devoted to his carpentry. Louis spent a lot of money on his wife and his own pleasures when there was absolutley no need. While the third estate was begging for more money, fewer taxes, and a good life, he was half ignoring them and tending to his own needs instead, when he could have been helping and taking care of his citizens as a good king should.
Answer:
Here is your answer bro:
Explanation:
World War I, also known as the Great War, began in 1914 after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria. His murder catapulted into a war across Europe that lasted until 1918. During the conflict, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire (the Central Powers) fought against Great Britain, France, Russia, Italy, Romania, Japan and the United States (the Allied Powers). Thanks to new military technologies and the horrors of trench warfare, World War I saw unprecedented levels of carnage and destruction. By the time the war was over and the Allied Powers claimed victory, more than 16 million people—soldiers and civilians alike—were dead.
Please mark me the brainliest .
