This is a very complex question, but they both collapsed due to:
decentralization and government corruption
plagues/ epidemics
high taxes
and invasions
Some differences are that the Chinese empires saw a revival while Rome didn't.
The industrial revolution impacted the environment. The world saw a major increase in population, along with an increase in living standards. This led to the depletion of natural resources. The use of chemicals and fuel in factories resulted in increased air and water pollution and an increased use of fossil fuels. With factories typically being heat based and burning coals, toxic waste would be built up and ultimately dumped into nearby rivers. Thus creating the pollution of water and air.
Answer:
Positive
Explanation:
Yeah, the political shifts were good at the turn of the nineteenth century. Voting continued to collapse to the masses, not only the dominant elite. In voting as well, white people without land were quickly allowed to vote.
The joy luck club, To all the boys I love, the karate kid, Have I ever
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The great thinker of the Renaissance argued that rhetoric is subordinate to logic further explaining that rhetoric is only concerned with style and delivery but logic should guide the "invention" canon, was Pierre de La Ramee, translated into English as Petrus Ramus.
Ramus (1515-1572) was a bright thinker during the Renaissance times and expressed many concepts about logic and the use of reason. Ramus also wrote about the correct use of Rhetoric, saying that the proper use of language was a determinant aspect of being eloquent.
