1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Blizzard [7]
2 years ago
15

Which ideas are explicitly stated in the preamble of the Louisiana Constitution, but not in the preamble of the US Constitution?

Check all that apply.
the defense of the people
the assurance of domestic tranquility
the establishment of justice
the protection of individual rights
the assurance of equality of rights
the promotion of health, education, and safety
History
2 answers:
bixtya [17]2 years ago
6 0
Defense of the people
Assurance of equality
Protection of individual rights.
faltersainse [42]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

the last 3

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The set of laws that closed the Boston Harbor and prevented the local Massachusetts government from meeting was the?
andre [41]
The Intolerable Acts were the set of laws that closed Boston Harbor and prevented the local Massachusetts government from meeting because the British Parliament made the government of Massachusetts under their control.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Caesar change the Roman Senate?
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer: He created new rules that made representation more equal between patricians and plebeians.

Explanation: in the early roman ages there were many solutions but the one Caesar chose was to create new rules that made representation more equal between patricians and plebeians.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What factor led civilizations to develop a division of labor
ra1l [238]
Because of the large amount of labour saved by giving workers specialized tasks in Industrial Revolution-era factories, some classical economists as well as some mechanical engineers such as Charles Babbage were proponents of division of labor.



7 0
3 years ago
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
3 years ago
Why was Andrew Jackson a president of contradictions?
drek231 [11]

Answer:

Jackson was elected the seventh president of the United States in 1828. Known as the "people's president," Jackson destroyed the Second Bank of the United States, founded the Democratic Party, supported individual liberty and instituted policies that resulted in the forced migration of Native Americans.

Explanation:

Before being elected to the presidency, Jackson gained fame as a general in the United States Army and served in both houses of the U.S. Congress. As president, Jackson sought to advance the rights of the "common man" against a "corrupt aristocracy" and to preserve the Union.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was alfred insulted by other scientists when he shared his theory at the conference in new york?
    10·1 answer
  • Answer:
    12·2 answers
  • Why is it helpful to compare a dot density map to a physical features map?
    8·1 answer
  • Which type of government has no distinct separation between the powers of the legislative branch and the executive branch, is he
    11·2 answers
  • What agency has been criticized for not adequately protecting consumers against faulty sunscreen labeling?
    9·2 answers
  • _______ policy in China allowed economic growth at the fastest sustained rate between 1980 and the early 2000s than any other co
    12·2 answers
  • Social change in the 1960s quiz
    8·2 answers
  • What are two things that keyed the growth of religion during the 1950s? religious presidents the Red Scare advent of television
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes where fossil fuels come from?
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement does not describe a reason why more Oklahomans migrated to urban areas after World War II? A. Cities offered ste
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!