1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VLD [36.1K]
2 years ago
7

What happens to a crop's price

History
2 answers:
Gelneren [198K]2 years ago
8 0
B — the more the product, the less the value
raketka [301]2 years ago
6 0
I would say the correct answer is c
You might be interested in
Which two elements of Alexander II’s reforms kept the serfs from gaining political power?
Stells [14]
The correct answers should be
<span>2 Serfs had to pay landowners a large tax and a fee for loans.
3 The zemstvos in charge of collecting taxes exploited the lower classes.

Zemstvos were like local governments that gained power due to the rise of capitalism which allowed accumulation of wealth. The serfs were no longer serfs but they had to pay huge taxes which led to civil unrest since poverty rose and often people starved to death because of inability to pay debt and taxes.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
15. How did the US respond to Villa's actions?
navik [9.2K]

The US respond to Villa's actions by The Pershing expedition

<u>Explanation:</u>

Since 1910 the Mexican revolution was causing utter destruction. In 1916, a leader named “Pancho” Villa crossed the Mexico border entered U.S and burnt down the Columbus town. It was actually an act of revenge that he wanted to take as Venustiano Carranza was declared as President of Mexico surpassing him.

Villa raided and took materials of war as he was desperate to take over the ammunition's and create a stir among the American government. This raid of Columbus definitely drew the attraction of the U.S. to wage a war against Mexico. The U.S responded by sending troops led by General Pershing in search of Villa which was unsuccessful.

8 0
3 years ago
4. Ture or False? Most Northerners thought slavery should not be allowed in new<br> western states.
Leni [432]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Discuss this section. How did the war promote Egalitarianism? What groups did not benefit from these freedoms and why?
I am Lyosha [343]

Answer: Indians

They gave up their own to get freedom and wealth

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these situations was not a result of the Articles of Union?
alexgriva [62]
The Acts of Union were two Acts of Parliament: the Union with Scotland Act 1706 passed by the Parliament of England, and the Union with England Act passed in 1707 by the Parliament of Scotland.

They put into effect the terms of the Treaty of Union that had been agreed on 22 July 1706, following negotiation between commissioners representing the parliaments of the two countries.

By the two Acts, the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland—which at the time were separate states with separate legislatures, but with the same monarch—were, in the words of the Treaty, "United into One Kingdom by the Name of Great Britain".

The two countries had shared a monarch since the Union of the Crowns in 1603 when King James VI of Scotland inherited the English throne from his double first cousin twice removed, Queen Elizabeth I.

Although described as a Union of Crowns, until 1707 there were, in fact, two separate Crowns resting on the same head (as opposed to the implied creation of a single Crown and a single Kingdom, exemplified by the later Kingdom of Great Britain).

There had been three attempts in 1606, 1667, and 1689 to unite the two countries by Acts of Parliament, but it was not until the early 18th century that both political establishments came to support the idea, albeit for different reasons.

The Acts took effect on 1 May 1707. On this date, the Scottish Parliament and the English Parliament united to form the Parliament of Great Britain, based in the Palace of Westminster in London, the home of the English Parliament.

Hence, the Acts are referred to as the Union of the Parliaments.

On the Union, the historian Simon Schama said "What began as a hostile merger, would end in a full partnership in the most powerful going concern in the world ... it was one of the most astonishing transformations in European history."

So I'm guessing, that the answer is D.
<span>
"Oliver Cromwell became Lord Protector."

Hoped I helped! Please correct me if I was incorrect. Thanks!

</span>



3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did invention of plastic affect technology?
    6·1 answer
  • Which was not a social or economic problem facing the United States at the end of the Civil War?
    14·2 answers
  • The business practice described above eventually led to the enactment of legislation that ???
    14·1 answer
  • Match each of these words with the phrase that best defines it bicameral demilitarization zaibatsu democratization
    5·1 answer
  • 2 Points
    13·2 answers
  • What should Quinn do to present her ideas successfully during a group discussion? introduce new discussion topics avoid referrin
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best completes this diagram?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the U.S. Constitution? A. A list of the people's responsibilities B. The law of the United States C. A list of the right
    5·2 answers
  • What were the results of “unconditional surrender” in the European and Pacific theaters of World War II?
    7·1 answer
  • Who created Eiffel tower?​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!