The correct answer is Simple
Explanation:
The sentence "Australia's rain forests are located in the northeast" is composed of a subject "Australia's rain forests" and a predicate "are located in the northeast" (verb and other details that complete an idea). This means this sentence only contains one clause (subject-verb/predicate unit) and due to this, it is classified as a simple sentence. Indeed, compound or complex sentences should contain two or more clauses but in simple sentences, there is only one clause or grammatical unit that is complete and expresses an idea.
I believe he r<span>elaxed under a large tree
I hope this helps :)</span>
Answer:
Number 1 is the opinion.
Explanation:
Number 2, Number 3, and Number 4 all are supported with sufficient evidence.
In Number 2, the passage refers to a real-life property, the "intellectual property", and therefore supports the sentence, providing a clear argument that the song is copyrighted.
In Number 3, the passage refers to judges and juries comparing different parts of the song. This is also what would happen in a real-life situation since copyright laws have strict policies equipped within them.
In Number 4, it provides an exact date to when the incident happened with Katy Perry and the people who have worked with her.
However, in Number 1, only because "the melody of the two songs sounding different" is not sufficient evidence for the audience to believe that the song is not copyrighted. More evidence is needed in order for this claim to be stronger.
Hope this helped!
~Jinachi~