Answer:
The agent probably knew about the murderer, because the accused only bought a ticket to return from the trip.
Explanation:
When the friend bought the travel tickets, he did not buy two tickets back, but only one, that is, he knew that his friend would not return, although he did buy two one-way tickets. Thus, this individual becomes the main suspect in the murder, since only the two friends were on the trip and it is necessary to investigate all the possibilities of his friend's death.
In this case, the police contacted the travel agent who passed all the ticket purchase information between the two friends.
Answer:
C. Section 55 - Her mind was still on the ball. His mind was on work the next day.
Explanation:
As one of Maupassant's themes is the "differences between men and women", we see that option C is the only reference that actually shows the contrast.
The above option which shows the contrast is actually referring to the differences between a man and a woman. In option C, we see that "Her mind was still on the ball" and while "His mind was on work the next day".
The reference tends to show the difference mindsets the man and the woman have.
The witches are the ones who give Macbeth the prophecy that he will one day become king, that Banquo with father kings, and that Macbeth can not be killed by anyone born of woman. These set off Macbeth's entire journey in the play and motivate him to kill the king, kill Banquo, and ultimately lead to his downfall.
Answer:
B). Rising action.
Explanation:
Rising action is described as the element of narrative that involves a chain of events taking the narrative towards the climax. It primarily functions to develop tension and interest in the narrative that builds the interest of the readers through the major decisions and characters' flaws.
In the given question, the excerpt from the poem exemplifies the 'rising action' as it involves significant thoughts of the protagonist 'Banished to the outfield and daydreaming Of water', 'Would suddenly..Barone', etc. <u>that takes the poem towards the climax('transfixed by easy arc before it hit My forehead with a thud') and create tension, suspense, and interest in the narrative</u>. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
The correct answer is D. School uniforms should not be required because they reduce individual expression.
Explanation:
A claim should always express the position of the author towards the issue being discussed, besides this, effective claims do not only express if the author agrees or disagrees but the reason or reasons for this. Additionally, claims should be debatable which means they need to be proven.
According to this "School uniforms should not be required because they reduce individual expression" is the best example of an effective claim because it shows the author opposes school uniforms, the reason for this "they reduce individual expression" and it is debatable.
