The correct answer to this open question is the following.
One of the “don’ts” in analyzing or evaluating a primary source is to avoid recreating the author’s experience of his society.
No, I don't agree with this statement because I consider that in order to truly understand the primary source, a good researcher has to understand the circumstance and the time in which the primary source was created.
This means, if it was during a war or a revolutionary period, the researcher has to understand and think as the author of the source did.
ANd I am clear using my words: understand. Not biasing the records, the facts, or misinterpret the situation, the context, or the facts.
Pretty much it would be <span>A. fought and slew a dragon.
hope this helps
</span>
Explanation:
Roman law, the law of ancient Rome from the time of the founding of the city in 753 BCE until the fall of the Western Empire in the 5th century CE. It remained in use in the Eastern, or Byzantine, Empire until 1453. As a legal system, Roman law has affected the development of law in most of Western civilization as well as in parts of the East. It forms the basis for the law codes of most countries of continental Europe (see civil law) and derivative systems elsewhere.
Washington<span> planed to combine his Continental Army with the French army and navy to </span>win<span> the fallen city and end the </span>war<span>.</span>
Answer:
The Red River Expedition, also called the Freeman-Custis or Sparks Expedition, was part of Jefferson's master plan. The Red River offered not only a path to acquire scientific knowledge but also perhaps an approach for American traders to Santa Fe.
Explanation:
