Answer:
The answer is : TRUE
Explanation:
This was a time of profound social and political crisis for Russia.The crisis in the social and state structure was accompanied by a dynastic crisis. Sophia Alekseyevna ruled as regent of Russia.
Sophia was eventually overthrown, with Peter I and Ivan V continuing to act as co-tsars, yet power was exercised mostly by Peter’s mother.
Peter implemented sweeping reforms aimed at modernizing Russia. Heavily influenced by his advisers from Western Europe, he reorganized the Russian army along modern lines and dreamed of making Russia a maritime power.
The reason why reformers connect the abolition and women's rights issues is that the fight for the American African women's rights had also led and influenced women abolitionist to fight for their own rights too. These reformers are people who would want to bring gradual change in the society.
In 1932, America suffered greatly during the Great Depression. The President at the time, Herbert Hoover, promised many reforms and improvements that would help everyone get back onto their feet. Those promises were broken as Hoover did little to pull America out of the Depression. As a result, Hoover wasn't really well liked, during and after the depression. When the elections of 1932 came around, Hoover decided to run again, but Americans went and voted for Roosevelt, who actually did something to help during the depression.
The third state was Florida.
Answer:
2) “Separate but unequal” schools are unconstitutional.
Explanation:
This is a statement from the outcome of the historical <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> lawsuit, which basically stated that "separate but equal" schools and facilities are unconstitutional.
From the passage, we can extract the words "the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place...Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs . . . are . . . deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment".
Essentially, this is saying that "separate but equal" is not actually equal, which means that the people (Brown) who sued the education district (Board of Education) were not awarded their full rights granted by the 14th Amendment - and that is unconstitutional.
