Excercise 1:
No, this is not simplified fully. The full answer would be <span>−7dk+14d−21k</span>−7, not <span>14d - 9 - 21k - 7dk + 2. So, it is not equivalent.
</span><span>
Excercise 4:
</span><span>7dk (2 - 3 - 1) - 7
</span>
Just multiply 7dk into (2) (-3) and (-1)
you'd get:
<span><span>−<span>14dk</span></span>+</span>−<span>7 after simplifying it fully.
</span>
p = parameter
w = width
w+2.75
p = 2w+2(w+2.75) = <span>4w</span>+<span>5.5 = 30
Answer to the last one:
w = 6.125</span>
1. You already did it.
2. Table
3. t (years since 1990)
4. n (# of cigarettes sold)
5. (t, n)
6. You can see the distribution of the data pretty neatly. There are also many more advantages including it's easier to calculate standard deviation, easier to see the mean, mode and median, and it's also much easier to just tell the extrema of the dataset by just looking at the scattergram.
the answer on number 14. is ×=3 your welcome now please give me brainlest
