Basically:
<span>Some thought it foolhardy to spend money on such a remote area. </span>
<span>The region seemed to have little value (at the time) and was remote and hard to defend. </span>
<span>Secretary of State Seward, who had long favored expansion, argued that the nation's strategic interests favored the treaty. </span>
<span>He was committed to the spread of American influence throughout the Pacific as a means of enhancing the nation’s trade and military standing. </span>
Answer:
The statement is true. During President Clinton's 1996 reelection bid, he used a political strategy later termed "triangulation," where he adopted some of the most popular Republican policies like welfare reform, making his opponents' positions seem extreme among middle-class voters.
Explanation:
Triangulation is a concept within politics which means that in basic political issues one seeks to find a third position between one's own and one that the opponent represents in order to be able to attract the often decisive group of voters in the political midfield.
The term triangulation was originally coined by Bill Clinton's former chief adviser DickMorris, as a way of describing his strategy to get Clinton re-elected as president in the 1996 election. Morris advocated a policy that was far more liberal with the Republican Party, while it differed from its own Democratic Party in traditional matters. Clinton was described as having used the method primarily when he began to receive weak support in Congress. The NAFTA free trade agreement of 1993 and the reform of social grants of 1996 are two examples of triangulation.
Answer:
To keep peace throughout the world;
To develop friendly relations among nations;
To help nations work together to improve the lives of poor people, to conquer hunger, disease and illiteracy, and to encourage respect for each other’s rights and freedoms;
To be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations to achieve these goals
Explanation:
The work of the United Nations impacts people around the world on issues related to peace and security, development and human rights; from disarmament to efforts to combat terrorism and extremism; from conflict prevention to peacekeeping and peacebuilding; from disease prevention to the promotion of gender equality and universal education; from refugee resettlement to humanitarian assistance; from the rule of law to the fight against transnational crime.
Yet, given the fundamental ways in which the world has changed over the last seven decades, there is a clear need to reform the United Nations and its principal organs.
One needs to look no further than the exponential growth of the membership of the Organization; from 50 countries in 1945 to 193 countries today. The United Nations needs to transform itself in line with current geopolitical realities to maintain its relevance and improve its effectiveness.
The General Assembly needs to be revitalized. The Security Council needs to be reformed. And the Economic and Social Council needs to be reinvigorated. Furthermore, the relationship between the General Assembly and the Security Council needs to be strengthened.
As we celebrate the 70th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations, we have an unprecedented opportunity to improve the everyday lives of people around the world, by putting “people at the centre of all we do”.
That would be <span>Clovis I.</span>
