Hello there!
Question #1
<span>What was established in the case of Miranda v. Arizona?
One aspect that they truly convened was the fifth amendment which were to require laws that conveyed certain things that would have to be considered and handled properly.
Question #2
</span><span>How does this affect the legal process?
This would affect is because before this, it was quite easier to acquire certain laws, and to easily dishonor them. But ever sense this came about, it was more serious.
Question #3
</span><span> In the case of U.S. v. Nixon, what did the court ultimately decide about the president with regard to rule of law?
They decided that the president does not inform or enforce the final decision. It would have to go into a process,and not a pure law straight abound.
I hope this helps you!</span>
Answer:
Correct answer is diary entries by President Carter
.
Explanation:
Third and fourth options are not correct as first of all textbook and encyclopedia are not a primary, but a secondary historical source.
On the other side, diary entries are the best primary source because are written sources from the perspective of someone who participated in certain events, in this case president Carter.
Second option is not correct option, but after the diary journal articles would be also important as are written in the period when certain events happened.
High taxes, intolerable act, and the government making decisions without holding vote
D. The creation of Israel led to several series of conflicts between the Palestinians (the original inhabitants of the land) and the Jews (the newcomers). These conflicts have continued to the present day
