In <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
<h3>What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.
The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.
Thus, in <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at brainly.com/question/7802791
#SPJ1
Answer:
D
Explanation:
"Why were most Texas land grants located in east and central Texas? Mexican officials wanted to settle areas closest to the United States."
Answer:
It's B. Wealthy voters lose some of their influence
Explanation:
I took the test. Hope this helps! ;) <3
Answer:
2, it's the best option out of all of them. If I had a choice though I would say 8 is the best.
Answer:
°^°
Explanation:
Humanism- A focus and study of ancient Greek and Roman texts and ideas.
Secularism- Not having to do with religion, a focus on non-religious matters.
Realism- An accurate potrayal of life and people, it shows life and people as they really are.
