The "policing of the Western Hemisphere" is a phrase that conveys Roosevelt's attitude when it came to international affairs. Roosevelt believed that the United States was justified in exercising this policing for several reasons. He argued that there had been chronic unrest or wrongdoing in the Western Hemisphere for a very long time, and someone had to put an end to it. Moreover, he stated that the United States would intervene in conflucts between European countries and Latin American countries if the European powers had a legitimate claim. He argued that this attitude would work because it came hand in hand with the Monroe Doctrine. While the Monroe Doctrine was meant to put an end to European intervention, the "corollary" (which stated the US intention to police the hemisphere) was used to justify American intervention.
The second assumption is that there is something exceptional about Africa, that while other continents and peoples have got or are getting richer, Africans, for reasons we can think but no longer speak in polite company, choose to remain in poverty. Our capacity to see Africa as divergent lets us off the hook so we don’t have to understand our own complicity in the challenges various African countries face today. It also means we rarely rage as we should against the actions of the corporations and governments that profit from instability, corruption or even inexperience (African negotiators at the climate talks have historically been disadvantaged by their lack of experience and the expectation among western negotiators that they should be grateful with whatever they get).
If there is, then, no innate propensity for corruption, violence or poverty in Africa, then the narratives that fuel the stereotypes need questioning. One possible explanation comes from the Nigerian author Chinua Achebe, who said: “The west seems to suffer deep anxieties about the precariousness of its civilisation and to have a need for constant reassurance by comparison with Africa.” Perhaps it’s not Africa that needs saving, but us.
because they're different ways
