1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
charle [14.2K]
2 years ago
6

Why do people risk there own lives just to stay alive in war time ?

History
1 answer:
True [87]2 years ago
4 0

Answer with Explanation:

People risked their own lives just to stay alive in war time because of their "political ideology." It was common for people to go to war, especially men, because it was deemed important in order to have<u> social order in the society.</u> This was also partly because of "pride" and "patriotism" to one's country which was common long time ago. They risked their own lives, not because they wanted to live but because <em>they wanted their families to be protected and to continue living.</em> Besides this, there were also laws<em> (the draft)</em> which strictly orders men to join the war whether they like it or not.<em> </em>

You might be interested in
Why was Antoine Lavoisier important
dimaraw [331]
His discovery of the role of oxygen. He recognized and named oxygen and hydrogen and opposed the phlogiston theory. He helped construct the metric system, wrote the first extensive list of elements, and helped to reform chemical nomenclature.
3 0
3 years ago
What can bronze artifacts tell us about the cultures that made them?
inna [77]
That they were advanced enough to do metalworking, and that they had access to bronze ore.
8 0
2 years ago
1. What is Sharia law?
stich3 [128]
1 is laws based on the quran 
2 is  ethnic group
4 0
3 years ago
What action would a loyalist have been least likely to take during the american revolution?
kaheart [24]

During the American Revolution, American society was divided between two groups. One group wanted to revolt against the British and become independent. Another group, known as loyalists, wanted to remain under the control of Great Britain.


With this in mind, it is easy to understand the fact that a loyalist would try to sabotage any efforts by the American colonists to break free from Great Britain. Along with this, loyalists would share inside information with the British military so that they would be aware of the rebels plans.


7 0
2 years ago
The decades around the year 50 BC saw the end of the Roman Republic, and the rise of the Roman Empire. What factors led to the d
dem82 [27]

The aristocracy (wealthy class) dominated the early Roman Republic. In Roman society, the aristocrats were known as patricians. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls, or leaders, who ruled the Roman Republic. A senate composed of patricians elected these consuls. At this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government. Both men and women were citizens in the Roman Republic, but only men could vote.

Tradition dictated that patricians and plebeians should be strictly separated; marriage between the two classes was even prohibited. Over time, the plebeians elected their own representatives, called tribunes, who gained the power to veto measures passed by the senate.

Gradually, the plebeians obtained even more power and eventually could hold the position of consul. Despite these changes, though, the patricians were still able to use their wealth to buy control and influence over elected leaders.

The Roman Senate

The history of the Roman Senate goes as far back as the history of Rome itself. It was first created as a 100-member advisory group for the Roman kings. Later kings expanded the group to 300 members. When the kings were expelled from Rome and the Republic was formed, the Senate became the most powerful governing body. Instead of advising the head of state, it elected the chief executives, called consuls.

Senators were, for centuries, strictly from the patrician class. They practiced the skills of rhetoric and oratory to persuade other members of the ruling body. The Senate convened and passed laws in the curia, a large building on the grounds of the Roman Forum. Much later, Julius Caesar built a larger curia for an expanded Senate.

By the 3rd century B.C.E., Rome had conquered vast territories, and the powerful senators sent armies, negotiated terms of treaties, and had total control over the financial matters of the Republic.

Senatorial control was eventually challenged by Dictator Sulla around 82 B.C.E. Sulla had hundreds of senators murdered, increased the Senate's membership to 600, and installed many nonpatricians as senators. Julius Caesar raised the number to 900 (it was reduced after his assassination). After the creation of the Roman Empire in 27 B.C.E., the Senate became weakened under strong emperors who often forcefully coerced this ruling body. Although it survived until the fall of Rome, the Roman Senate had become merely a ceremonial body of wealthy, intelligent men with no power to rule.

Occasionally, an emergency situation (such as a war) arose that required the decisive leadership of one individual. Under these circumstances, the Senate and the consuls could appoint a temporary dictator to rule for a limited time until the crisis was resolved. The position of dictator was very undemocratic in nature. Indeed, a dictator had all the power, made decisions without any approval, and had full control over the military.

The best example of an ideal dictator was a Roman citizen named Cincinnatus. During a severe military emergency, the Roman Senate called Cincinnatus from his farm to serve as dictator and to lead the Roman army. When Cincinnatus stepped down from the dictatorship and returned to his farm only 15 days after he successfully defeated Rome's enemies, the republican leaders resumed control over Rome.

The early Roman Republic often found itself in a state of constant warfare with its surrounding neighbors. In one instance, when the Romans were fighting the Carthaginians, Rome was nearly conquered. The people of Carthage (a city in what is today Tunisia in north Africa) were a successful trading civilization whose interests began to conflict with those of the Romans.

The two sides fought three bloody wars, known as the Punic Wars (264-146 B.C.E.), over the control of trade in the western Mediterranean Sea. In the second war, Hannibal, a Carthaginian general, successfully invaded Italy by leading an army — complete with elephants — across the Alps. He handed the Roman army a crushing defeat but was unable to sack the city of Rome itself. After occupying and ravaging Italy for more than a decade, Hannibal was finally defeated by the Roman general Scipio at the Battle of Zama in 202 B.C.E. Hope You Like My Answer!:)


3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the framers decide only 9 of 13 states would need to ratify the constitution, rather than 13 of 13 needed for the articl
    10·1 answer
  • Beer Street and Gin Lane, William Hogarth, 1751 The migration to urban centers that is evident in the source is most likely a re
    8·2 answers
  • What was the relationship between the Shona people and the groups along the Swahili Coast?
    14·2 answers
  • Helpppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
    13·1 answer
  • How did j.p Morgan’s life differ from that of Andrew Carnegie?
    12·1 answer
  • What challenges did the United States encounter during the construction of the canal?
    11·1 answer
  • 11 12 13 14 15 16 6 How was Sumer organized politically? O as an empire as a republic O into city-states O into tribal villages
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a true statement regarding the Normandy (D-Day) invasion?
    8·1 answer
  • On what day did the US have two presidents, sort of?
    9·1 answer
  • What were some of the freedoms/rights African Americans did not have during the early 1900’s?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!