Answer:
I will choose Project B
Payback period of Project A is 4.2 years
Explanation:
IRR shows the percentage rate at which the net present value of the cash flows are zero. The more IRR rate of the project the more beneficial it is.
IRR
Project A = 31%
Project B = 38%
In this Question the IRR of Project B is higher so, it will be more beneficial and I will select it based on IRR ignoring all other factors.
Payback period of Project A is 4.2 years means 4 years, 2 months and 12 days.
Answer:
The cost basis for the land is equal under both options.
Explanation:
If Taylor pays Ella $150,000 in cash and assumes the mortgage of $100,000, the cost basis of the land will be $250,000 (= $150,000 + $100,000). If he decides to pay Ella the full amount of $250,000, that will also be the cost basis of the land.
The only real difference is that if Taylor decides to assume the mortgage, he will need a smaller initial cash flow ($150,000).
Answer:
$26,700 excess
Explanation:
The amount of deficiency or excess can be determined only when the ending cash balance is known. The ending cash balance is the addition of the net movement in cash to the opening cash balance.
The net movement is the difference between the total receipts and the total payments or disbursement.
Total receipts for January
= $1,061,200
Total payments
= $984,500
Net movement = $1,061,200 - $984,500
= $76,700
Ending balance = $290,000 + $76,700
= $366,700
If the minimum cash requirement is $340,000
The amount of the (deficiency)/excess cash (after considering the minimum cash balance required) for January
= $366,700 - $340,000
= $26,700
Answer:
d. With trade, Brazil should specialize in sugar cane and China in iPods.
Explanation:
As from the given situation it can be seen that Brazil has an absolute advantage while producing the sugarcane as it takes one unit of labor for generating one unit of sugarcane
On the other hand, china has an absolute advantage for generating an ipod as it takes four unit of labor to generate one ipod
Therefore the option d is correct
Answer: True. Indirect Denial method should be considered before direct method.
Explanation: The indirect denial method of dealing with a customer is a method in which the customer is first agreed with when expressing a wrong objection. In this method, the customer's argument is first held to be valid, and this is done in order to create a level of trust or confidence with the customer.
After rapport has been established, evidence can then be brought to dispute the customer's claims.
By using the method, the customer doesn't feel threatened or alarmed from the onset and a heated argument will be avoided.
Direct denial method is the opposite of indirect denial method, in this case, strong arguments are used to oppose a customer's claims to show that they have made a mistake.
