Answer:
Chris could have let his son go with his wife when she left him.
Chris could have given his son up for adoption in a foster home.
Explanation:
Chris Gardener is compelled to leave his son when his wife Linda leaves him, but he commands that his son (Christopher) has to stay with him though he doesn’t have a job to feed him every day. Letting his son go with his wife who has gotten a job in New York would have eases the financial burden on him.
Having once lived himself in a foster home, giving up his son for adoption would have given both of them an easier and quicker route to living better, but Chris stuck with his son.
Answer:
because no plans, sanitary codes, or building regulations controlled the rampant growth of English cities, the poor lacked adequate housing and many were forced to live in dark, filthy, overcrowded slums under unhealthy and unsafe conditions
negative:
overpopulation
debt increase
high taxes
workhouses: conditions were bad
inadequate housing: no plans/sanitary codes/building regulation
positive:
more jobs
closer to jobs
workhouses: since govt wanted to make sure people feared workhouses, families were split, poor wore uniforms, everyone had to work, etc.
The answer to this question is the "Writ of Habeas Corpus". Such as under the doctrine of Writ of Habeas Corpus, the judges normally feel the need to follow the rulings established by prior the court decisions. Justiciable controversy habeas corpus precedents stare decisis previous next. The writ of habeas corpus is a written command where become the basis of the offices during jurisdiction.
Answer:
Stalin
Explanation:
During the second half of the 1920s, Joseph Stalin set the stage for gaining absolute power by employing police repression against opposition elements within the Communist Party.
Answer:
jsjdjkxkxksnenn4jrkckkckejennrnrnrkrkfkcj
Explanation:
euhehehebebjdjxjdjdjfujcjcjcjciciieh
