Victor Frankenstein was a promising young doctor and brilliant scientist. He had the potential to do much good for humanity (he wanted to cheat death), but he had a fatal flaw -- the pride, or hubris, which saw him creating a humanoid monster for his own glorification. Ambition and shortsightedness got in the way of commonsense.
The monster was also flawed--he murdered people,such as William and Elizabeth. However, at the end he reveals a human side. He is a tragic, pathetic figure, utterly lonely, miserable, and rejected by human society. He had wanted the normal human comforts of a wife and family but these were denied him by his creator who refused to make a wife for him.
Answer:
1) This passage does not contain an argument. It begins with a comment that everyone knows the U.S. is having an election (in 2008); the author proceeds to state three things that he thinks Europe should focus on. He does not offer reasons for his statement that these three things are jobs, Muslims, and neighbors.
2) This passage contains both an argument and a sub-argument. 1.The butler was passionately in love with the victim. Thus, 2. It was not the butler who committed the murder. 3. Either the butler committed the murder or the judge committed the murder. Therefore, 4. The judge committed the murder. The sub-argument goes from (1) to (2), and the main argument goes from (2) and (3) to (4). Note again: identifying the structure does not imply saying that this is a good argument.
3) This passage contains an argument. Standardization: (1) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish can know whether that other person deserves punishment. (2) No one who cannot know whether another person deserves punishment has a right to punish that person. Therefore, (3) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish another person has a right to punish that person.
He was Poseidons son, so he asked his father for help.
<span />
Answer:
there is no question here
