Answer:
1. Invalid and weak
2. Invalid and strong.
Explanation:
The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.
Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.
The French Revolution was a period of far-reaching social and political upheaval in France that lasted from 1789 until 1799. It was also partiality leaded by Napoleon later expansion of the French empire
Heres a website that might help you out
<span>In written prose, it is expected that thoughts are organized and coherent. Unlike colloquial language, we have the ability to edit written language</span>
Before returning to the proper lane, sign and have a look at your interior rearview mirror and ensure you can see the front bumper of the car you just exceeded.
Before you return to the right lane, signal and observe your indoor rear-view reflect and make certain you can see the front bumper of the automobile you surpassed. appearance quickly over your right shoulder to make certain that you can see as minimum numerous toes of pavement between your vehicle and the only you exceeded.
One way to do this is to search for the vehicle for your internal rearview reflection. whilst you may see each headlight in your rearview replicate, you may have enough room to return to your riding lane. everything out the back automobile window the identical manner you could see it in case you turned round to appearance.
Learn more about rearview here
brainly.com/question/2821478
#SPJ4
