1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
satela [25.4K]
3 years ago
13

What does this question mean? I am confused on the wording of it.

English
2 answers:
iren [92.7K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Its asking have you ever done anything that you know from the beginning would fail

Explanation:

Nina [5.8K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

the question is asking if you did something before that obviously wouldnt work out but you still did it even though you knew it wasnt gonna work

Explanation:

hope this helps lmk if u still dont understand it

You might be interested in
Will mark brainliest!! Please helpppp!!
Aleks [24]

Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor and the 1986 Nobel Peace Prize stands in front of a room full of important government people; he wants his audience to recognize that being indifferent is not the same as being innocent – indifference, “after all, is more dangerous than anger or hatred”.

He forces the listeners to wonder which kind of people they are. To him, during the Holocaust, people fit into one of “three simple categories: the killers, the victims, and the bystanders” and he forces the bystanders to decide whether or not to stay indifferent to the actual situation. He takes the time to list various actual civil wars and humanitarian crises (line 17 of his speech) and contrast them with WWII.

He makes sure that his audience realise what is at stake “Indifference, then, is not only a sin, it is a punishment” [for mankind]. He wants the audience to be really affected by what they hear – so he talks to them in their condition of human being: “Is it necessary at times to practice [indifference] simply to … enjoy a fine meal and a glass of wine”. And he also talks to them as government people with their duty and the power they have over the actual conflicts. He wants them to compare themselves with their predecessors during WWII: “We believed that the leaders of the free world did not know what was going on … And now we knew, we learned, we discovered that the Pentagon knew, the State Department knew.”

Wiesel finishes his speech by expressing hope for the new millennium. We believed he addresses these final words to those who will refuse to stay indifferent. But it seems that Wiesel would count them in the minority: “Some of them -- so many of them -- could be saved.” probably refers to this minority.

4 0
3 years ago
How is Macduff similar to Macbeth​
ZanzabumX [31]
Each of them want to kill the other treachery
3 0
3 years ago
what evidence supports the theme that belief can thrive even in dire situations? check all that apply. "they thought of how they
Marysya12 [62]

Three pieces of evidence support this belief, these are the lines "they thought of how they had laboured," "what discouragements they had overcome" and "they gambolled round and round the windmill, uttering cries of triumph."

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • Animals are being exploited and living in bad conditions, even after the revolution that promised them so much.
  • This was all aggravated after the windmill stopped working, as it was essential for the farm's well-being.
  • All of this made them feel very despondent about the whole situation.
  • When the windmill was recovered, they felt very happy and ignored all the problems they were going through.
  • They skipped around the mill, as its working was a point of happiness amidst the difficulties they were going through.

With that, even though there were still many problems on the farm, they felt excited, mainly because the mill was fixed by their work.

This question is about "Animal Farm" and you can find more information about it here:

brainly.com/question/11909124

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It takes a boat going upstream 11 hours to cover the same distance, as it would cover in 9 hours going downstream. What is the s
hodyreva [135]

Answer:

20 km/hr

Explanation:

time taken by the boat going upstream = 11 hours

time taken for downstream movement = 9 hours

speed of the current = 2 km/h

distance traveled by the boat = d

Assume the speed of boat be x

we know,

distance =  speed × time

moving upstream

distance = speed × time

            d  = (x -2) × 11

downstream

             d = (x+2) × 9

now  

       (x+2) × 9 = (x -2) × 11

              2 x = 40

                 x = 20 km/hr

hence, the speed of the boat will be 20 km/hr

6 0
3 years ago
What is the knight's crime?
Artemon [7]
In the Wife of Bath's tale, the Knight has raped a young maiden. His punishment for doing so is death; he is to have his head cut off. However, the King agrees to hand him over to the Queen. The Queen tells the Knight that he must come up with the answer to this question: What do women most desire?
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does Victor Frankenstein's story parallel the story of Prometheus and
    9·1 answer
  • I need help..pls ....
    12·1 answer
  • What is revealed about Mr. Browning's character when he calls Jonathan Johnny Boy in section 5?
    15·1 answer
  • What is Dickinson's perspectives<br><br>about life in her poems?
    15·1 answer
  • HELPPPPP!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • How was the Olmec stone discovered?
    7·2 answers
  • Name an advocate for environmental causes
    10·1 answer
  • In an argumentative essay, a counterclaim is
    9·2 answers
  • In Julius Caesar, who was the first conspiritor to stab Caesar?​
    10·1 answer
  • Which excerpt from The Odyssey - Teiresais is this paraphrasing?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!