He is planning the windmill
Five doesn’t need the word has before finished and seven is just read <3
Answer:
D. She danced along to the song on the radio.
Explanation:
Option D is the correct answer because it is written in iambic pentameter.
An iambic pentameter refers to the line that has a pattern or rhythm that has to do with the number of syllables in the line and the emphasis placed on those syllables. In an iambic pentameter, from the word "pent", it's clear that the line has 5 stressed syllable.
For an iambic pentameter in a poem, every single line of that poem will definitely have five stressed syllables.
William Shakespeare's works are known to be often used as examples of iambic pentameter.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The given passage is taken from the novel "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley.
In the novel, the creature/monster demands Victor to create for him a companion. He compares himself with Adam of Paradise Lost. Just like God created Eve for Adam he demands Victor to create a female monster for him just like God the creator did for his creation Adam his creation. The creature in the novel mourns his loneliness.
Answer:
It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
Explanation:
When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.
In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.
He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?
He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.
After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.
The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.