4 from what I read but are you sure you didn't leave anything out?
<h2>1960 and today's teenagers lives contradictory.</h2>
Explanation:
Across the world, there is a major transition from now to then. There are various factors associated. One reason could be, "Technology innovation" too.
1960 Teens:
- Works according to the guidance of parents
- Get experience along with guidance of elders first and then take decision
- Judge a person by moving with him/ her for years
- Does not depend entirely on first impression. Takes risks only after thoroughly moving. Less possibility of falling into problems.
Today's Teens:
- Works according to what he / she thinks.
- Take decision on his / her own. But few gets guidance from their elders
- Judge with outward look
- Assume that a person is good / bad according to the first impression and even might fall into problems
I would interpret it as how people only look at reality, not what's inside or what they can't see.
The three components of a scientific argument are:
1- THE CLAIM
The claim is a conclusion achieved that answers the original question.
2- THE EVIDENCE
The evidence is used to support the claim. It has to be sufficient, correct qualitative, quantitative and appropiate.
3- THE REASONING
The reasoning is the part that links the claim with the evidence, showing why the data correctly supports the claim made at the begining of the process.
