Answer:
Answer E: undermine the traditional basis of a claim about conventional medicine’s legitimacy
Explanation:
Correct. The author discusses Eddy’s study in the context of elaborating on the question she asked in the fourth paragraph, “But how scientific is conventional ‘scientific’ medicine anyway?” This question challenges the perspective on conventional medicine described in the first paragraph, which sees conventional medicine as “scientific” and alternative medicine as “pseudoscience.” Since Eddy’s study concluded that conventional medical decision making was not based on strong scientific evidence, it provides evidence that refutes the traditional argument for the legitimacy of conventional medicine.
The answer is definitely C. she read a story of a woman who died of rabies.
I just re-read the story to make sure that my answer is correct, and it is.
I had to find the choices,but the answer is D) To tell a story to the audience.Hope this helped :) Can you please mark brainliest,I need two more to rank up :)
Answer:
There is some debate over the actual start of the Renaissance. However, it is generally believed to have begun in Italy during the 14th century, after the end of the Middle Ages, and reached its height in the 15th century. The Renaissance spread to the rest of Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries
plz brainly me :) <3
