Answer:
about the history of the university from creation to destruction and the genealogies of Kings, heroes,safe and deites
Analyzing the scenario, we see that the situation is repeated by the second. It may be that the first time, the woman did not know. But she had already been accused before, that is, that the second time, this was considered intentional and malicious conduct.
According to the penal code § 594, this act is considered vandalism, that is the defacing of another’s property with graffiti “or other inscribed material,” or damaging or destroying another’s property and this cant be done negligently, with the will to do the damage.
If she convicted of felony vandalism again, the maximum prison sentence is three years (after being convicted before) and fines can be up to $10,000. When the damage caused by the vandalism exceeds $10,000, the fines can be increased to $50,000. Then, comes the restitution (paying the owner property for the damage), and possibly community service.
Police violence should be the best answer. There are all types of marchers, marching for different things. There would only be a lack of support from other citizens if those marches weren’t agreed with by the majority, basically saying that some marches had support from others. A repeal of voting legislation is definitely not the answer, as a march is not enough to strip someone’s voting rights away, no matter what time period we’re speaking of. A lack of nation television coverage could be a near answer, as some marches may be seen unimportant and therefore not being televised. But as the question directs to marchers experiences, and not a certain march, this wouldn’t be right. By using order of elimination, the only available, and reasonable answer would be police violence, as many marches are seen as public disorder, and therefore treated by the law. Most of the time, these marches are made to disrupt, and polices mostly respond with brutality or brute.
B, it states in the definition that “god only gave them the right to rule”. It shows clear dictatorship.
