Okay i got you, jus add me back
oof that's a rough one with a few different answers. it depends on how bad the disease is. if it's not very serious i don't see the harm in a epidemic of something tiny (like the common cold) but i mean that's just me on the other hand if they have something extremely infectious and moderately-extremely lethal i would say yes. This is a tough question ;-;
Quindlen says that even in the face of diversity, all American citizens are united as one big and powerful country. Although this union is something positive in the country, Quindlen shows that diversity also generates conflicts within the country, in addition to generating inequality within citizens, which in addition to being negative, hurts the concepts of freedom and equality which formed this country. Despite these statements showing contrast and contradiction, they strengthen Quindlen's argument, because even with these problems, in times of need conflicts are forgotten by people and the union is established in defense of diversity, throughout the country.
Yes, for the most part it sounds correct