1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
____ [38]
3 years ago
13

Why was it important to the plebeians to have Roman laws written down?

History
1 answer:
Sergeeva-Olga [200]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

plebeians took part in all government branches and part of the trubunes. ... it was important to write rome's laws down because the plebeians protested the unfairness of rome's unwritten laws. then the particians agreed to finally write a collection of laws on 12 wooden tablets or tables.

You might be interested in
Article VI of the US Constitution says that the Constitution is the “__________ Law of the Land.”
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]
"Supreme Law of the Land"
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compared with the rest of Europe, northern Italy had many
solong [7]
Assuming you're referring to the same time period as before, compared with the rest of Europe, northern Italy had many "trading routes" that stretched far beyond the confines of the country itself. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was a cause of the French and Indian War?
IgorC [24]
The answer I believe is B !
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What aspects of the national government exemplify the framers plan to have representatives focused on national rather than perso
Nataly_w [17]
The legislative aspect
The framers believed that the legislative house would be the most  democratic, nationalistic looking and would check the excesses of the executive. The role of the national assembly would be to deliberate on issues of national importance.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
BRAINLIEST ASAP!!! 99 POINTS!!! PLEASE HURRY!!!
OleMash [197]

The checks and balances keep every branch of the govt. from victimization their job to induce too powerful. the perspective of Federalists on ratifying the Constitution is that a powerful national government is required to shield voters from threats, which the Constitution ought to be sanctioned like a shot to stop injury. the perspective of Anti-federalists on ratifying the Constitution is that the Constitution doesn't give enough protection for people's rights, which there's Not enough protection for powers of state governments.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was meant by the rise of the common man during the age of Jackson
    9·1 answer
  • Why do historians need to be careful about being unbiased when presenting historical information?
    14·2 answers
  • How did adolf hitler affected history?
    13·2 answers
  • Why do you think Hamilton was looked to so much by people in government about who he would support?
    13·1 answer
  • What is not a characteristic of a Federalist?
    13·2 answers
  • Which was the most characteristic of United States society at the end of the 1800s?
    8·1 answer
  • Examine the excerpt from Abraham Lincoln, Second Inaugural Address, March 4, 1865. “With malice (resentment, bad feeling) toward
    8·1 answer
  • 15 points pls help<br><br> what is the importance of a family tradition
    13·1 answer
  • Which idea came from the Magna Carta?
    11·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 10
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!