1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fittoniya [83]
3 years ago
13

What can the Supreme Court do if a law violates the Constitution?

History
2 answers:
Leni [432]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A triangle is shown Below based on this triangle which one of the following statements is true

Explanation:

myrzilka [38]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A veto (Latin for "I forbid") is the power (used by an officer of the state, for example) to unilaterally stop an official action, especially the enactment of legislation. A veto can be absolute, as for instance in the United Nations Security Council, whose permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) can block any resolution, or it can be limited, as in the legislative process of the United States, where a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate will override a presidential veto of legislation.[1] A veto may give power only to stop changes (thus allowing its holder to protect the status quo), like the US legislative veto, or to also adopt them (an "amendatory veto"), like the legislative veto of the Indian President, which allows him to propose amendments to bills returned to Parliament for reconsideration.

Explanation:

The concept of a veto body originated with the Roman offices of consul and tribune of the plebs. There were two consuls every year; either consul could block military or civil action by the other. The tribunes had the power to unilaterally block any action by a Roman magistrate or the decrees passed by the Roman Senate.

You might be interested in
How did americans create a national government that respected both the independence of states & the rights of individuals?
viva [34]
The states still had the freedom to create their own laws and have their own constitutions (as long as they don't go against by the Constitution). The states have reserved powers. 
The rights of the individuals are respected mainly by being listed in the constitution's first ten amendments, or Bill of Rights.  
8 0
2 years ago
Which accurately describes a result of the conflict between England and Spain during the 1500s? Neither country was able to defe
Lelechka [254]
The answer would be the first one.
6 0
2 years ago
Can Someone Help). Question 1) About five thousand years ago, the rains over the Sahara began to decline and grasslands gave way
FrozenT [24]
The mongols for the second question
3 0
3 years ago
In the United States, political leaders are elected to represent the American people. While presidents, governors, and legislato
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Answer:

I think it's John Locke

Explanation:

correct me if I'm wrong

5 0
3 years ago
Do you think any of the philosophers or the religious leaders were abolitionists or advocated for the end of enslavement?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:

Black and white abolitionists in the first half of the nineteenth century waged a biracial assault against slavery. Their efforts proved to be extremely effective. Abolitionists focused attention on slavery and made it difficult to ignore. They heightened the rift that had threatened to destroy the unity of the nation even as early as the Constitutional Convention.

Although some Quakers were slaveholders, members of that religious group were among the earliest to protest the African slave trade, the perpetual bondage of its captives, and the practice of separating enslaved family members by sale to different masters.

As the nineteenth century progressed, many abolitionists united to form numerous antislavery societies. These groups sent petitions with thousands of signatures to Congress, held abolition meetings and conferences, boycotted products made with slave labor, printed mountains of literature, and gave innumerable speeches for their cause. Individual abolitionists sometimes advocated violent means for bringing slavery to an end.

Although black and white abolitionists often worked together, by the 1840s they differed in philosophy and method. While many white abolitionists focused only on slavery, black Americans tended to couple anti-slavery activities with demands for racial equality and justice.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the mid-1800s, western settlers and american indians differed in their views about?
    8·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of ziggurats in ancient Sumer?
    9·2 answers
  • The expansion and stability of the Inca Empire was aided by
    12·2 answers
  • How does the meaning of the word "islam" fit muhammad's life ?
    13·1 answer
  • British advantages during the american revolution
    15·1 answer
  • The concept of empiricism states that all rationally accepted knowledge is determined from experience. Francis Bacon was one of
    14·2 answers
  • Who entrusted Marco Polo to carry out his business?
    15·2 answers
  • ?????????????????????????????????/
    10·2 answers
  • Explain how the black death was both an illness and historical event 30 POINTS ALL I HAVE I NEED RN PLEASEEE
    11·1 answer
  • Who was the first person to represent the British government in the G
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!