The answer is "States sent representatives to Congress and provided soldiers and some officers to protect the country."
Maby it was b b is the best
The answer to your question is true.
Absolute monarchy in France led to continued acceptance of serfdom, while in England serfdom disappeared.
Constitutional monarchy in England led to representative government without a revolution, while France required a revolution.
Absolutism in France delayed the intellectual Enlightenment, while England's constitutional monarchy fostered the Enlightenment.
England's constitutional monarchy efficiently corrected the ills of poverty, while in France the monarchy ignored the poor.
War on the Western Front from late 1914 to most of 1918 can be characterized as a stalemate during which little ground was gained. Thus, Option 1 is the correct choice.
<h3>What is a stalemated conflict?</h3>
Stalemate describes a situation in battle wherein neither side can alternate the front lines dramatically regardless of how tough it tries. WWII in no way reached a stalemate in Europe.
The warring parties alternated offensive and protective campaigns, however, they had constantly been moving. World War I epitomized a stalemate.
Therefore, the War on the Western Front from late 1914 to most of 1918 can be characterized as a stalemate during which little ground was gained. Thus, Option 1 is the correct choice.
Learn more about stalemate conflict here:
brainly.com/question/20719044
#SPJ1
