Buddhism was not a religion of large-scale missionary culture. For centuries, the Buddha's teachings spread peacefully and heterogeneously across the Indian subcontinent, and from there to all of Asia. With each new culture it reached, Buddhist methods and styles were being modified to fit the local mentality without compromising the essential points of wisdom and compassion.
The spread of Buddhism was spontaneously carried out by the Buddhists, who voluntarily followed Buddha's instructions. In some cases the expansion took place organically, because of the interest of the population in the beliefs of foreign Buddhist merchants who crossed the water and spread the Buddhist values. In other cases, rulers adopted Buddhism in order to help develop ethical values in their people.
It should be emphasized here that the message of Buddha did not have any coercive or compulsory aspect; on the contrary, the Buddha's message was simply helping other people overcome inner unhappiness and suffering.
I would believe your answer is <span>A. Isaac Newton</span>
<span>Certainly not. The United States has never, since its founding, consisted of a small number of citizens, still less of citizens that could practically assemble in one place at one time and debate their actions. A pure democracy in this classical Greek city-state sense was never practical, and was not seriously considered.
What the Framers created was a constitutional representative republic. Sovereignty is vested in the people, like a democracy (and unlike a constitutional monarchy), but the people do not rule directly. Instead, they elect representatives, at regular intervals, and these rule in the peoples' stead. Their powers are limited, first, by the fact that they are elected for only short terms, and must be re-elected if they wish to continue in power, and secondly, and much more importantly, by the Constitution itself, which puts express written limits on their powers even between elections.</span>
Answer: D ( On Margin)
Explanation:
Buying on Margin means you are investing with borrowed money. It amplifies both gain and loss
The answer is systemic.
the blm movement was to confront the police brutality that was exerted onto POCs which formed the term ACAB. which in term means they work for a b*st*rdized system filled with systemic racism and inequality.
hope this helps!
