I can tell you how to solve this problem.
You can find the areas using both the values as the radiuses (find the are of a circle).
Subtract the smaller area from the larger area and there is your answer.
Hope this helped.
Good Luck!
Answer: False
Natural numbers are not closed under division
Some natural numbers divide to get another natural number. For example, divide 10 over 2 to get 10/2 = 5.
However, there are infinitely many natural numbers that divide to get something that isn't a natural number. Example: 10/7 = 1.43 approximately. All we need is one counterexample to contradict the original statement.
A set is considered closed under division if dividing any two values in that set leads to another value in the set. More formally, if a & b are in some set then a/b must also be in the same set for that set to be closed under division.
If we changed "natural numbers" to "rational numbers", then that set is closed under division. If p, q are rational numbers then p/q is also rational. Basically, dividing any two fraction leads to some other fraction. The value of q cannot be zero.
Answer:
Alex and his two friends had to pay $ 7.25 for a ticket.
Step-by-step explanation:
simply divide $21.75 by 3
Answer:
True, the scores are not valid.
Step-by-step explanation:
The test supposed to be measuring intelligence. We can assume that the intelligence of most people relatively stable (will not change too much over a short amount of time), and can expect it should go upward with brain growth and education. But the test seems to give a huge decrease from the first and second results. Then the third result is a huge increase that even higher than the first test.
We don't know the true value of the subject, but seeing the huge gap for every repetition we can tell that the test result lacks precision.
This is literally what I'm doing in school right now...
Answer: (A) TRUE
