Answer:
D)
The first author argues that most children should be
vaccinated, and the second author argues that many
children do not need to be vaccinated.
Explanation: D is the correct formulated option, since both of the authors goals are to persuade parents into whether their child is to be vaccinated or not. Thus cutting to the chase. In arguments like these, authors would rather focus on persuasion, backed up by evidence, especially in critical arguments like these (based on the health of children).
The statement that best explains the conflict revealed in the passage is C. The conflict is external and takes place between the narrator and her mother over whether the narrator will learn to play the piano.
<h3>What is Conflict?</h3>
This refers to the disagreement between two or more entities where there is a constant struggle between them.
Hence, we can see that based on the complete text, there is the use of narration to reveal the external conflict that exists between the narrator and her mother over whether the narrator will learn to play the piano.
Read more about conflict here:
brainly.com/question/26083560
#SPJ1
No Theseus didn't afraid of water.