Hello
Answer: C. After James got off his horse, he removed the saddle.
Explanation: this is a subordinated clause. The subordination is giving by the subordinate conjunction "after"; thence, we hope to find 2 parts in the sentence and in past. Therefore, options A and B would not work as they are not using any past. However, in option D, we have first simple past (preterite) and then past perfect, and this is not logically right because of the use of after in the sentence. In this sense, the only correct answer is C. After James got off his horse, he removed the saddle. Simple past + simple past.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
gaklsjlaklñagylanhhkalñjhajhghja
hi how are u
The author's strongest support for their statement is the reference to a major claim (Option B). In it, the author alludes to the strongest and clearest declaration that agrees with their statement by quoting the authors of Suburban Nation. This is not an allusion because of the direct nature of this reference (allusion = indirect reference). There is no repetition observed in this paragraph, and the author doesn't comment on what the opposing party believes. Therefore, by logic and by elimination, we can conclude that this is an example of a reference to a major claim.
Merely. This is because it describes how the children splashed in the water.
First of all/ Which Shiloh book are you talking about?
