1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bonufazy [111]
3 years ago
10

How does monarchy lead a more prosperous society? Please help 2-3 sentences is fine:’(

History
1 answer:
Zigmanuir [339]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The monarchy also stabilizes the state by encouraging slow and gradual change instead of extreme change in the nature of the regime. The monarchy of the Arab state has built a much more stable society than the non-military Arab state, many of which have undergone such seismic changes during the Arab Spring.

Explanation:

I think the first sentence would be good for the answer but I'm not sure about the second question. If it didn't help you I'm sorry. But definitely monarchy helps stabilizing the state by encouraging slow rather than extreme change in the nature.

You might be interested in
What would have been an advantage to living in an ethnic enclave?
Katarina [22]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

most people woudl share your culture. hope this helps! :))

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which factor was a major consideration at the time india was being partitioned
Sergeu [11.5K]
One of the <span>amajor consideration at the time india was being partitioned would be: </span>tensions between Hindus and Muslims
A lot of religious based violence happened between these two religious groups at the time of partition. In the end, the majority of Muslims group were absorbed to the region that we know today as Pakistan and the Hindus stayed in the India that we know today.
7 0
4 years ago
How can you show your opposistion to what you consider sn unjust law?
Simora [160]
Through civil disobedience, as in protesting or using the first ammendment right to voice your opinion
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Drag the following events that contributed to the rise of totalitarianism in Germany in
Kisachek [45]

<em>On January 30, 1933, President Paul von Hindenburg names Adolf Hitler, leader or führer of the National Socialist German Workers Party (or Nazi Party), as chancellor of Germany. </em>

<u><em> Use this information to answer your question.</em></u>

<em>Hindenburg, intimidated by Hitler’s growing popularity and the thuggish nature of his cadre of supporters, the SA (or Brownshirts), initially refused to make him chancellor. Instead, he appointed General Kurt von Schleicher, who attempted to steal Hitler’s thunder by negotiating with a dissident Nazi faction led by Gregor Strasser. At the next round of elections in November, the Nazis lost ground—but the Communists gained it, a paradoxical effect of Schleicher’s efforts that made right-wing forces in Germany even more determined to get Hitler into power. In a series of complicated negotiations, ex-Chancellor Franz von Papen, backed by prominent German businessmen and the conservative German National People’s Party (DNVP), convinced Hindenburg to appoint Hitler as chancellor, with the understanding that von Papen as vice-chancellor and other non-Nazis in key government positions would contain and temper Hitler’s more brutal tendencies. </em>

<em> </em>

<em> </em>

<em>Hitler’s emergence as chancellor on January 30, 1933, marked a crucial turning point for Germany and, ultimately, for the world. His plan, embraced by much of the German population, was to do away with politics and make Germany a powerful, unified one-party state. He began immediately, ordering a rapid expansion of the state police, the Gestapo, and putting Hermann Goering in charge of a new security force, composed entirely of Nazis and dedicated to stamping out whatever opposition to his party might arise. From that moment on, Nazi Germany was off and running, and there was little Hindenburg or von Papen—or anyone—could do to stop it. Purred largely by the German people’s frustration with dismal economic </em>

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
French, Portuguese and Spanish Empires (what did they control in the New World)
Stolb23 [73]
Spain and Portugal controlled land in Latin and South America. Spain controlled what is now Mexico, New Mexico and Texas. It also controlled countries part of South America such as Argentina,Colombia and Venezuela. Portugal controlled Brazil. France controlled parts of the United States(Louisiana purchase land). It also had control of Canada.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one thing Walt Whitman wanted for the entire country
    7·1 answer
  • Whu it is important that the president and Congrees work together in resdving governmental issues?
    7·2 answers
  • AP US History question:
    15·1 answer
  • Which of following is a factor production A. eduction B. government rules C. human labor D. climate
    5·1 answer
  • How long ago did tribes settle between the 7 hills?
    12·1 answer
  • Many city governments grant operating licenses to a specific cable television company. This license to be the only cable provide
    14·2 answers
  • In late 1997, president mandela __________ as leader of the african national congress.
    14·1 answer
  • What was the main cause of the May 4th Movement?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the colonists not like mercantilism?
    12·1 answer
  • Policy adoption is a step in which of the following?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!