1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
N76 [4]
3 years ago
10

NO LINKS,!!! NO ASSESSMENTS OR TEST. NOT MULTIPLE CHOICE.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Paladinen [302]3 years ago
5 0

Answers:

  • a)  cost is going down by 1 cent for every 1000 units produced
  • b)  f(x) = -0.00001x + 0.97
  • c)  $0.78 or 78 cents

==============================================

Explanation:

Part (a)

The two points (12000, 0.85) and (38000,0.59) of interest here. Use the slope formula on them

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

m = (0.59-0.85)/(38000-12000)

m = -0.26/26000

m = -0.00001

The rate is -0.00001 dollars per unit

In other words, the cost is going down by 0.00001 each time 1 unit is made.

This amount is incredibly small when focusing on one unit, but we can multiply by 10^3 (aka 1000) to get to -0.00001*10^3 = -0.01 which is more manageable.

What does this mean? It means that the cost is going down by 1 cent for every 1000 units produced, which to me seems like a more realistic phrase that is easier to grasp.

Of course, all of this applies only when 120000 < x < 38000.

---------------------------------

Part (b)

In the previous part, we found the slope was m = -0.00001

Plug in (x,y) = (12000, 0.85) and solve for b

y = mx+b

0.85 = (-0.00001)*(12000)+b

0.85 = -0.12+b

0.85+0.12 = b

b = 0.97

The y intercept is 0.97

The function for that diagonal line is f(x) = -0.00001x + 0.97

However, that function is restricted to the domain [12000, 38000] as the graph shows.

---------------------------------

Part (c)

Plug x = 19000 into the function we just found

Note how x = 19000 is in the domain [12000, 38000]

f(x) = -0.00001x + 0.97

f(19000) = -0.00001*19000 + 0.97

f(19000) = -0.19 + 0.97

f(19000) = 0.78

When you produce 19000 units, the cost per unit is $0.78 or 78 cents.

---------------------------------

As for the tax question, I'm not entirely sure. But it appears that the city council may have given the company tax relief as long as the company has made more than 12000 units (since this is where the cost curve starts to decrease). Perhaps this is the council's way of encouraging more economic activity and job growth.

Keep in mind that average cost curves tend to dip downhill when the amount produced goes up. After a certain point however, the average cost will start to increase. The company cannot expand forever and keep costs at a minimum. All of this is independent of taxes so it's not entirely clear if taxes played a role in that decreasing curve or not.

You might be interested in
Freeeeeeee POINTS!!!!!!! !!!!❤!!!!!​
pychu [463]

Answer:

thanks i guess

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List 3 values that would make this inequality true 180&gt;15y
horrorfan [7]
So if we want to make sure y x 15 is less than 180, we can plug in low values and check the inequality.

If we plug in 0, we get 180 > 0 which is true.

If we plug in 1, we get 180 > 15 which is true.

If we plug in 2, we get 180 > 30 which is true.

Therefore, 3 values that satisfy the inequality are 0, 1, and 2.
6 0
3 years ago
Graph the parabola.<br> y=(x+1)^2-3
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

<h3>tap on the picture to see.</h3>

Step-by-step explanation:

that should help

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If n is a positive integer and r is the remainder when (n – 1)(n + 1) is divided by 24, what is the value of r?
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

(1) n is not divisible by 2 --> pick two odd numbers: let's say 1 and 3 --> if , then and as zero is divisible by 24 (zero is divisible by any integer except zero itself) so remainder is 0 but if , then and 8 divided by 24 yields remainder of 8. Two different answers, hence not sufficient.

(2) n is not divisible by 3 --> pick two numbers which are not divisible by 3: let's say 1 and 2 --> if , then , so remainder is 0 but if , then and 3 divided by 24 yields remainder of 3. Two different answers, hence not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Let's check for several numbers which are not divisible by 2 or 3:

--> --> remainder 0;

--> --> remainder 0;

--> --> remainder 0;

--> --> remainder 0.

Well it seems that all appropriate numbers will give remainder of 0.

4 0
4 years ago
Which of the following is the algebraic expression that best descibes the sequence 7, 14, 21, 28 ?
sertanlavr [38]
'Multiples' of 7...? 
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Jason buys sports equipment worth $80.00 and pays 5% sales tax. What is the total amount Jason pays including sales tax, for spo
    13·2 answers
  • What is the slope of line a?
    7·1 answer
  • Hakim is preparing for a cross country meet. Hakim is going to run from his house to Jacob's, then to Kent's, and finally back h
    13·2 answers
  • Standard form of x^2+y^2+16x+32y+311=0
    8·1 answer
  • Round 2063 658.497 to the nearest hundred
    5·1 answer
  • A company that makes hair-care products had 4,000 people try a new shampoo. Of the 4,000 people,
    5·2 answers
  • What is the simplified form of 10x-5+3x-2
    14·1 answer
  • Calculate the volume of the cube
    15·2 answers
  • 192, 144, 108,….<br><br> Find the recursive and explicit formula
    11·1 answer
  • Find the least number which is excatly divisible by 12, 16, and 24​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!