1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serjik [45]
3 years ago
11

Rauch Inc. leases a piece of equipment to Donahue Corp. on Jan 1 2017. The lease agreement called for annual rental payments of

$4892 at the beginning of each year of the 4 year lease. The equipment has an economic useful life of 6years, a fair value of $25,000, a book value of $20,000, and both parties expect a residual value of $8,250 at the end of the lease term, though this amount is not guaranteed. Rauch set the lease payments with the intent of earning a 5% return, and Donahue is aware of this rate. There is no bargain purchase option, ownership of the lease does not transfer at the end of the lease term, and the asset is not of a specialized nature.
1. Suppose the instead of $8,250, Rauch expects the residual value at the end of the lease to be $5,000, but Donahue agrees to guarantee a residual value of $8,250. All other facts being eqaul, how would Rauch change the amount of the annual rental payments, if at all?

2. Explain how a fully guaranteed residual value by Donahue would change the accoutning for Rauch, the lessor.

3. Explain how a bargain renewal option for one extra year at the end of the lease term would change the accounting of the lease for Rauch, the lessor.
Business
1 answer:
Eduardwww [97]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

1. Suppose the instead of $8,250, Rauch expects the residual value at the end of the lease to be $5,000, but Donahue agrees to guarantee a residual value of $8,250. All other facts being eqaul, how would Rauch change the amount of the annual rental payments, if at all?

<em>A lower residual value means the car is expected to hold its value less (depreciate more) over the lease term. </em>

<em>Therefore, since most of the lease payment covers the cost of depreciation., more depreciation (or lower residual value) will most likely result into higher monthly payments over the lease term.</em>

<em />

2. Explain how a fully guaranteed residual value by Donahue would change the accounting for Rauch, the lessor.

<em>The financial accounting term </em><em><u>guaranteed residual value</u></em><em> has to do with an additional payment made by a lessee in property, cash, or both at the termination of the lease. </em>

<em>Therefore since Guaranteed residual values are financial commitments made by the lessee, they are factored into the calculation of the minimum lease payment.</em>

<em />

3. Explain how a bargain renewal option for one extra year at the end of the lease term would change the accounting of the lease for Rauch, the lessor.

<em>A bargain renewal option is a clause in a lease contract that gives the lessee the option of extension of the term of the lease at a substantially lower trate than the going market rate. </em>

<em>The presence of this clause in a lease contract will most likely imply that the lease will change to a finance lease rather than an operating lease</em>

You might be interested in
Mrs. Beld sold marketable securities with a $79,600 tax basis to her daughter for $60,000 cash. Two years later, the daughter so
Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:

$13,400

Explanation:

Data provided in the question:

Tax basis of marketable securities = $79,600

Amount for which securities sold to daughter = $60,000

Amount for which daughter sold the  securities = $93,000

Now,

Mrs. Beld disallowed loss on the related party sale to her daughter

= Tax basis of marketable securities - Amount for which securities sold to daughter

= $79,600 - $60,000

= $19,600

Realized gain by her daughter = $93,000 - $60,000

= $33,000

Therefore,

The daughter's gain recognized on sale

= Realized gain by her daughter - Mrs. Beld disallowed loss

= $33,000 - $19,600

= $13,400

8 0
3 years ago
Carroll Corporation has two products, Q and P. During June, the company's net operating income was $25,000, and the common fixed
Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

Option (d) is correct.

Explanation:

Total Segment Margin = Net Operating Income + common fixed expenses

                                       = $ 25,000 + $ 37,000

                                       = $ 62,000

Total Segment Margin = Segment Margin of Q + Segment Margin of P

$ 62,000 = $ 21,000 + Segment Margin of P

or Segment Margin of P = $ 62,000 - $ 21,000

                                         = $ 41,000

4 0
3 years ago
According to the law of comparative advantage, both individuals and nations will be able to produce a larger joint output if eac
zzz [600]

Answer:

the low opportunity cost producer. 

Explanation:

A person or nation has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other countries or people.

For example, let's assume country x produces either 10 Apples or 5 oranges in 1 hour while country y produces either 20 Apples or 2 oranges in one hour. The opportunity cost for country x of producing apples and oranges are 0.5 and 2 respectively. While for country y, the oopportunity cost of producing apples and oranges are 0.1 and 10 respectively.

Country y has an opportunity cost and comparative advantage in the production of Apples while country x has a comparative advantage in production of oranges.

I hope my answer helps you

5 0
3 years ago
The value of which of these expressions is closest to e?
coldgirl [10]

Answer: B

Explanation:

Therefor, value 2.659 is closest to the value of e

( I hope this helped of not I’m sorry)

6 0
2 years ago
Ashton, an appraiser, is estimating value using the sales comparison approach. He applies more weight to two comparables over se
alexandr402 [8]

When Ashton, the appraiser applies more weight to two comparables over several others he used, he is utilizing the: Correlation method.

<h3>What is the Correlation Method?</h3>

The correlation method is the method utilized in the sales comparison approach where more importance is given to two properties being compared against some others.

The sales comparison approach itself is used in analyzing the worth of a property by comparing it to others that have been sold in recent times.

Learn more about the sales comparison approach here:

brainly.com/question/14497595

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Bob enters into a contract with jim and jen to build their new custom dream home in florida, and they agree on a price. before c
    12·1 answer
  • What shows the quantities of products demanded at each price by all consumers in a market?
    5·2 answers
  • Bakit mahirap na matamo ang kaganapang pantao​
    10·1 answer
  • Three basic decisions must be made by all economies. What are they?
    14·1 answer
  • The CEO of Otis Elevators says they measure elevator populations in countries as units installed per thousand people. According
    10·1 answer
  • Laelle is a confectionery company that manufactures candies. It does not use specific strategies to target children while market
    14·1 answer
  • 71. When making decisions that are ethical under either profit maximization or corporate citizenship theories, a business should
    12·2 answers
  • I.
    5·1 answer
  • The means by which the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics determines who is employed and unemployed is a ______.
    9·1 answer
  • Which loan type provides interest subsidy meaning department of education pays your interest.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!