1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lostsunrise [7]
3 years ago
9

Which amendment protects from unreasonable “search & seizure”?

History
1 answer:
Novay_Z [31]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Fourth Amendment: The constitution, though the Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law.

Explanation:

I majored in Health

You might be interested in
In the early 1800s, the empresario system was responsible for
Marysya12 [62]
In the early 1800s, the impresario system was responsible for :
granted the right to settle on land in exchange for recruiting and taking responsibilities for new settlers

hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
____________________ is the sacred text of Islam that contains the words of Muhammad and focuses on doctrine and law.
Greeley [361]

Answer:

Hadith.        hope that helps :D

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Beethoven studied with which other composer
rosijanka [135]
Mozart I think hope this helps

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3 Points
REY [17]

Answer:

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them.[2][3] The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two reasons prevented the British from settling in major parts of Africa during the Age of Exploration?
Over [174]

Answer:

I'd say disease and trade

Explanation:

If I'm wrong sorry please let me know

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do members of Congress believe that casework is important?
    6·1 answer
  • The president of the senate also serves as the ___________. (1 point) head of the appropriations committee lieutenant governor m
    9·1 answer
  • What where most Mexican citizens doing in Texas as their job in the early 1800’s
    8·2 answers
  • The National Socialist movement must strive to eliminate the disproportion between our population and our area. –Adolph Hitler,
    12·2 answers
  • How has the history of voting in America impacted us today in 2020?
    5·1 answer
  • Which group arrived in iran in 1218 under the leadership of genghis khan where it devastated the area?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did some Arab traders and others who lived in the Arabian Peninsula follow the lifestyles of nomadic herders
    15·1 answer
  • Matriarchal is best defined as a
    5·1 answer
  • What were the major events of sherman's invasion of the south
    11·1 answer
  • What were some of the reasons of Greek colonization in 750 bc and 550bc
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!