No one can help you with that. It's asking for YOUR experience and we're not you, sorry.
Answer:
The rhetorical question is: "Who knows whether considering ourselves all as victims would not allow us, wherever we are, to muster sufficient ire to rebuild our material world with the bricks and mortar of collective enterprise?"
The author ends with a rethorical question in order to make a point, the effect of this question expresses irony. It is not a matter of who is bravier for staying or leaving the country. All of the argentinians suffered from it, is not a matter of judging the fact of staying or migrating.
Explanation:
The author wants to prove a point she says no one is a fool for staying or leaving in the time of the dictatorship. In such cases, people only do what they best can to survive, and some don't even make it.
They are all victimis, and all of them had to rebuild their world as survivers.
For instance the intelectuals that had to migrate and start from zero, and the ones that by staying also stayed without a roof or had to live in terror. One decision ir not more eroic than other.
Answer:
3
Explanation:
if you take two sticks and then gather one more stick you now have 3 sticks. Sorry I know that this is how you would explain it to a child but most people understand it better if you break it down.
Just think of two things that could be compared in an unusual way! A metaphor is just a comparison that doesn't use "like" or "as". For example, a simile would be "My love is like a rose" but a metaphor would be "My love is a rose" If you think of it this way, it might be easiest to think of a simile then take away "like" or "as". Be creative with it and have fun
Answer:
The essay begins with the three principles of imagism, including “Direct treatment of the 'thing'.” Pound defines “image” as “an intellectual and emotional complex in an instant of time.” He elaborates on the “rules” of imagism, advising precision, and proclaiming, among other things, “Use either no ornament or good
Explanation: