The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D. voters in a state should decide whether or not to stay in the union." Popular sovereignty was a policy stating that v<span>oters in a state should decide whether or not to stay in the union.</span>
Many people don't choose the right choices. Murder, kidnapping, robbing are some. They either suffered some harsh life and wanted to take out their anger on others so they could feel their pain?
Sorry, I don't really know..
Answer:
They have kept the country intact
Explanation:
I think this is a very interesting question. In my opinion, I think they have kept the country intact, look at it this way. Political parties means that there exists choice for the people. Absence of political parties makes it a 1 man ruling without the necessary checks and balances. Like in that of a monarchical ruling t, or military ruling. Essentially, one can do and undo as one wishes.
Now, the advent of political parties brings choice, meaning the people can choose. In a situation where party A doesn't fulfill its political campaign promises, they are at risk of being voted out by the people for party B. Party B themselves won't sit down idle, while not in power, they wake the people up to the wrongdoings of party A.
Like I said, the presence of political parties brings choice to the people, and also creates checks and balances. So, yes, they have kept the country intact.
1. it created new jobs 2. It was an edvancement In tec. 3. They could hire young children and women for less and They made more money
