Answer:
<h3>country with an absolute monarchy would have no democratic values while in a country with constitutional monarchy, the power would be shared within the monarchy and the people.</h3><h3 />
Explanation:
A country with an absolute monarchy would have no democratic values as the overall power would be in the hands of a monarchy. Such countries would be governed by a single person and all citizens would be a subject to the king/queen.
On the other hand, a country with constitutional monarchy would have a monarchical system but the monarchy would exercise its power in accordance to the constitution. The monarchy is not sovereign and the power would be shared within the monarchy and the people.
In a transition from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy, <u>the common people</u> are gaining more power or representation.
The diseases in the Americas and Pacific Island <u>devastated the lives of the isolated native people. It dislocated and destroyed their social systems as they had no cure or immunity to diseases from the outside world</u>.
It did not hold back European expansion in these areas because <u>most Europeans were immune to such diseases. Instead, it gave an advantage to the colonists from Europe to easily defeat the ailing natives.</u>
Answer:
true
Explanation:
the emperor of rome varied in time of the empire, but the romans were know for their gladiators and collisium events. The empire also responded to political threats and ways to gain power. economic opportunities were always a good thing, and varied in seasons with trade with other places.
Its aim was to force the British to improve the lot of the poor and to grant independence to India.
Answer:
Charles was King, Cromwell was King in all but name. Both had their own "Personal Rules" Charles from 1629 to 1640 and Cromwell from 16th December 1653 to 3rd September 1654 when they ruled without Parliament. Both had their own council of advisors; Charles had a privy council and Cromwell had a Council of State
