1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alchen [17]
3 years ago
9

Read the excerpt from Does My Head Look Big In This?

English
2 answers:
maks197457 [2]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Answer is A

Explanation:

Took the quiz on edge 2021

11111nata11111 [884]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

nostalgic

Explanation:

You might be interested in
9) What does the author mean by the use of the word medium in the first paragraph? -0) A) the intervening substance through whic
Anon25 [30]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

I think if Its not right I'm sorry

7 0
2 years ago
How does Don Anselmo’s sale of his land, but not the trees on that land, help reveal a theme in the story?
yawa3891 [41]
Don Anselmo's action allows him to continue to plant trees...
5 0
3 years ago
Name 2 celebrations that honour rules​
Ber [7]

Answer:

j

Explanation:

j

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In relation to “A Shocking Accident,” what word best describes Jerome's attitude toward his father's memory? . A) worshipful . B
crimeas [40]
In relation to "A Shocking Accident," the word that best describes Jerome's attitude towards his father's memory is B. conflicted. 
7 0
3 years ago
Tolstoy uses a third person omniscient point of view in the novella The Death Of Ivan Ilyich. Most of chapter 1 is narrated from
Mars2501 [29]

The Death of Ivan Ilyich uses a third person omniscient narration, so the narrator is able to describe the thoughts, actions, and motives of multiple characters. If the first four chapters of the novella were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view, her judgment and perspective would have clouded the way we see the thoughts, actions, and motives of the other characters. For example, if the section about Ivan Ilyich's funeral had been told from her perspective, the narration might have been overly focused on her apparent grief. But readers, privy to her internal thoughts, would also realize that she didn’t care much about her husband, in life or in death. She might have centered the narration around Ivan Ilyich's suffering, how even she suffered because of Ivan Ilyich's illness, and how it was better now that he was gone. She would describe the ordeal she went through in the last few days before Ivan Ilyich's death. Given her apparent selfish character, she might well have made it seem like she suffered more than Ivan himself.  

The account of their marriage would also have been different if told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's perspective. She would probably portray Ivan Ilyich as a suitable match for herself. She might focus on the fact that he was a successful magistrate from a good family with good character and fine dancing skills. She would describe their courtship, how she fell in love with him, and their marriage in greater detail. She might tell us how she was really happy to be married to him, at least initially, and describe the first few months of her marriage as beautiful and happy. She’d likely describe how being a mother was hard and demanding, made more difficult by a husband who wasn't supportive. She would describe her outrage when Ivan starts to spend more time with friends, at parties, and at bridge games, apparently to avoid her.

Her perspective about Ivan Ilyich's illness would also be very different from what we actually read in chapter 4 of the novella. She'd probably complain about how Ivan was trying to get attention by fussing about some trivial health problem. She'd feel that his illness was his fault because he wouldn’t follow the doctor's instructions and would eat and drink all the wrong things, while she had to bear the consequences of his "illness."

Some details from the first four chapters would also be missing if the story were told from Praskovya Fyodorovna's point of view. For example, we wouldn’t have known of Ivan Ilyich's colleagues' thoughts about and reactions to his death. Praskovya wasn't part of this discussion, and she obviously couldn’t read their minds. She wouldn't have been able to write about Peter Ivanovich's fears and thoughts about death. The details of Ivan Ilyich's early life would also vary depending on her knowledge of Ivan Ilyich's family and his childhood. She wouldn't have been able to describe what Ivan was going through after their marriage and the birth of their children because he wasn't sharing his thoughts and feelings with her. And lastly, she was probably clueless about Ivan Ilyich's health concerns and his fear of death because they didn't talk much about it.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • And then all night we celebrated the birth of my baby brother. This sentence uses inverted syntax. How would it read if the sent
    13·1 answer
  • In "Little Things Are Big," the narrator was on the subway because he was going to a party. true or false?
    7·1 answer
  • Which idea should be included in a summary of We’ve Got a Job by Cynthia Levinson?
    6·2 answers
  • I need help writing a paragraph
    11·2 answers
  • Identify all nouns and pronouns in the following sentence:
    8·1 answer
  • An example of standard English syntax
    8·1 answer
  • If you are a genius, then answer this it's an online quiz based on the story called two paragraphs "An Episode of War"​
    7·1 answer
  • What is a real-world example of an eristic argument? Like a speech or article.
    11·1 answer
  • A text that describes events in the order they happened is structured according to
    8·1 answer
  • Which audience and purpose would be most appropriate for the following sentence? Let's all jump into this mess together and see
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!